www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - std.perf

reply Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn gmail.com> writes:
Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not 
an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.
Oct 08 2006
parent reply Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji gmail.com> writes:
Lutger wrote:
 Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not 
 an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.

Honestly, I think its just an oversight. D's perf module is actually a port, however, of a C++ library (STLSoft:WinSTL). The best I can recommend is to examine the D source (dmd/src/phobos/std/perf.d) and the documentation for the C++ version: http://synesis.com.au/software/stlsoft/help/group__winstl__perf__library.html -- Christopher Nicholson-Sauls
Oct 09 2006
parent Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn gmail.com> writes:
I see, that explains the doxygen doc. It seems that ddoc can deal with 
doxygen in a reasonable way though. Initially I thought it might be like 
recls, still shipped with phobos but not really a part of it as I 
understand.

Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
 Lutger wrote:
 Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it 
 not an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.

Honestly, I think its just an oversight. D's perf module is actually a port, however, of a C++ library (STLSoft:WinSTL). The best I can recommend is to examine the D source (dmd/src/phobos/std/perf.d) and the documentation for the C++ version: http://synesis.com.au/software/stlsoft/help/group__winstl__perf__library.html -- Christopher Nicholson-Sauls

Oct 10 2006