• mandel (7/7) Dec 02 2007 Hi,
• Jarrett Billingsley (2/9) Dec 02 2007 That's not even a valid grammatical construction. It doesn't compile.
• mandel (2/3) Dec 02 2007 Sorry, I managed to mix up my paste buffer and didn't noticed it.

mandel <oh no.es> writes:

Hi,

I like to ask of the meaning of
static this Foo {}
I thought I could use it like the C++ namespace keyword.
But static doesn't seem to have an effect.
Things that do not have an effect should result in compiler
warnings or even errors.

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> writes:

"mandel" <oh no.es> wrote in message news:fiu42i$22kk$1 digitalmars.com...
 Hi,

 I like to ask of the meaning of
 static this Foo {}
 I thought I could use it like the C++ namespace keyword.
 But static doesn't seem to have an effect.
 Things that do not have an effect should result in compiler
 warnings or even errors.

That's not even a valid grammatical construction.  It doesn't compile. 

mandel <oh no.es> writes:

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
 That's not even a valid grammatical construction.  It doesn't compile.

Sorry, I managed to mix up my paste buffer and didn't noticed it.