digitalmars.D.learn - question about property for built-in type
- %u <djvsrose gmail.com> Oct 08 2010
- "Denis Koroskin" <2korden gmail.com> Oct 08 2010
- %u <djvsrose gmail.com> Oct 08 2010
- Stanislav Blinov <blinov loniir.ru> Oct 08 2010
Hi,
I'm learning D right now and got a question about property.
I tried to add a property for built-in type like the following
property bool equalZero(double a) { return a == 0.0; }
void main()
{
...
double x = 4.4;
bool isXZero = x.equalZero;
...
}
but got an error message
main.d(75): Error: no property 'equalZero' for type 'double'
I tried similar thing with int[] and it works.
Is that I did something wrong or property does not support built-in type like
double, int, real, ...?
Appreciate for your time and answer.
Oct 08 2010
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:19:43 +0400, %u <djvsrose gmail.com> wrote:Hi, I'm learning D right now and got a question about property. I tried to add a property for built-in type like the following property bool equalZero(double a) { return a == 0.0; } void main() { ... double x = 4.4; bool isXZero = x.equalZero; ... } but got an error message main.d(75): Error: no property 'equalZero' for type 'double' I tried similar thing with int[] and it works. Is that I did something wrong or property does not support built-in type like double, int, real, ...? Appreciate for your time and answer.
Uniform Function Call syntax (i.e. a.b(c) -> b(a, c)) only works for arrays atm. This may or may not be changed in future.
Oct 08 2010
Thanks for the reply. I wonder are there any alternatives to achieve similar things for built-in types? I think this is very helpful for template function for built-in types.
Oct 08 2010
08.10.2010 16:19, %u wrote:Hi, I'm learning D right now and got a question about property. I tried to add a property for built-in type like the following property bool equalZero(double a) { return a == 0.0; } void main() { ... double x = 4.4; bool isXZero = x.equalZero; ... } but got an error message main.d(75): Error: no property 'equalZero' for type 'double' I tried similar thing with int[] and it works. Is that I did something wrong or property does not support built-in type like double, int, real, ...? Appreciate for your time and answer.
What you're trying to do is utilize uniform function call syntax (foo(T) === T.foo()), but that is currently supported *only* for arrays. AFAIK it's going to be implemented at some point, but right now you will have to use equalZero(a) instead of a.equalZero.
Oct 08 2010









%u <djvsrose gmail.com> 