• "Jan Hanselaer" <jan.hanselaer gmail.com> May 01 2007
• Deewiant <deewiant.doesnotlike.spam gmail.com> May 01 2007
• Dave <Dave_member pathlink.com> May 01 2007

"Jan Hanselaer" <jan.hanselaer gmail.com> writes:

Do I understand it well that there's no function inlining at all when you 
compile without the -inline parameter?

And that the compiler chooses which functions to inline when you compile 
with the -inline parameter?
And if so, anyone knows what the exact criteria are? I read something like 
no inlining when there's a loop in the function, but are there more 
criteria?

Greetz
Jan 

Deewiant <deewiant.doesnotlike.spam gmail.com> writes:

Jan Hanselaer wrote:
 Do I understand it well that there's no function inlining at all when you 
 compile without the -inline parameter?
 


Most likely yes.

 And that the compiler chooses which functions to inline when you compile 
 with the -inline parameter?


Yes.

 And if so, anyone knows what the exact criteria are? I read something like 
 no inlining when there's a loop in the function, but are there more 
 criteria?
 


Another one is that functions containing inline asm aren't inlined.

Dave <Dave_member pathlink.com> writes:

Deewiant wrote:
 Jan Hanselaer wrote:
 Do I understand it well that there's no function inlining at all when you 
 compile without the -inline parameter?


 Most likely yes.
 
 And that the compiler chooses which functions to inline when you compile 
 with the -inline parameter?


 Yes.
 
 And if so, anyone knows what the exact criteria are? I read something like 
 no inlining when there's a loop in the function, but are there more 
 criteria?


 Another one is that functions containing inline asm aren't inlined.


It would be great if -v listed the functions inlined.