digitalmars.D.learn - XML D2.x parsing &
- Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips+d gmail.com> Jul 20 2009
- Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> Jul 21 2009
- Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips gmail.com> Jul 21 2009
- Ary Borenszweig <ary esperanto.org.ar> Jul 22 2009
- Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com> Jul 21 2009
- Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> Jul 21 2009
- Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com> Jul 21 2009
According to the documentation having & in a tag will be turned to & http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_xml.html#text I observe that this is not the case. And if an attribute contains & it is turned into &amp; What is the best way to receive the same output for both. The code that follows outputs Attr: What &amp; Up Elem: What & Up *testfile.xml:* <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Tests> <Test thing="What & Up">What & Up</Test> </Tests> *test.d:* import std.stdio; import std.xml; void main() { auto file = "testfile.xml"; auto s = cast(string)std.file.read(file); auto xml = new DocumentParser(s); xml.onStartTag["Test"] = (ElementParser xml) { writeln("Attr: ", xml.tag.attr["thing"]); }; xml.onEndTag["Test"] = (in Element e) { writeln("Elem: ", e.text); }; xml.parse(); }
Jul 20 2009
Jesse Phillips wrote:According to the documentation having & in a tag will be turned to & http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_xml.html#text I observe that this is not the case. And if an attribute contains & it is turned into &amp; What is the best way to receive the same output for both. The code that follows outputs Attr: What &amp; Up Elem: What & Up *testfile.xml:* <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Tests> <Test thing="What & Up">What & Up</Test> </Tests>
Clearly std.xml is buggy. Correct behaviour would be Attr: What & Up Elem: What & Up The best place for bug reports is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ Stewart.
Jul 21 2009
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:37:38 +0100, Stewart Gordon wrote:Jesse Phillips wrote:According to the documentation having & in a tag will be turned to & http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_xml.html#text I observe that this is not the case. And if an attribute contains & it is turned into &amp; What is the best way to receive the same output for both. The code that follows outputs Attr: What &amp; Up Elem: What & Up *testfile.xml:* <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Tests> <Test thing="What & Up">What & Up</Test> </Tests>
Clearly std.xml is buggy. Correct behaviour would be Attr: What & Up Elem: What & Up The best place for bug reports is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ Stewart.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3200 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3201
Jul 21 2009
Ary Borenszweig <ary esperanto.org.ar> Brad Roberts escribió:Jarrett Billingsley wrote:On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Brad Roberts<braddr puremagic.com> wrote:Jesse Phillips wrote:On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:37:38 +0100, Stewart Gordon wrote:Jesse Phillips wrote:According to the documentation having & in a tag will be turned to & http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_xml.html#text I observe that this is not the case. And if an attribute contains & it is turned into &amp; What is the best way to receive the same output for both. The code that follows outputs Attr: What &amp; Up Elem: What & Up *testfile.xml:* <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Tests> <Test thing="What & Up">What & Up</Test> </Tests>
Attr: What & Up Elem: What & Up The best place for bug reports is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ Stewart.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3201
written by Janice who seems to have dropped off the face of the planet. It's little more than a first draft with serious performance problems and several important bugs. Anyone want to volunteer to invest some time in improving it?
parsers which are, like, the fastest. Ever. http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/04/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs/ I'm just saying, it'd seem like pointless duplication of effort with such parsers _already available_. If it could be relicensed, I'd say that's the best route.
Relicensed and separable from the rest of Tango. It's been way too long since I looked at that code in Tango to recall any of its details. Basically I agree with you on this one. :)
Can't just phobos dissappear? :-( Like... it must be the first standard library in the world that's developed by 3-5 people.
Jul 22 2009
Jesse Phillips wrote:On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:37:38 +0100, Stewart Gordon wrote:Jesse Phillips wrote:According to the documentation having & in a tag will be turned to & http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_xml.html#text I observe that this is not the case. And if an attribute contains & it is turned into &amp; What is the best way to receive the same output for both. The code that follows outputs Attr: What &amp; Up Elem: What & Up *testfile.xml:* <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Tests> <Test thing="What & Up">What & Up</Test> </Tests>
Attr: What & Up Elem: What & Up The best place for bug reports is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ Stewart.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3200 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3201
The xml parsing code in D2 could use some love and care. It was originally written by Janice who seems to have dropped off the face of the planet. It's little more than a first draft with serious performance problems and several important bugs. Anyone want to volunteer to invest some time in improving it? Later, Brad
Jul 21 2009
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Brad Roberts<braddr puremagic.com> wrote:Jesse Phillips wrote:On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:37:38 +0100, Stewart Gordon wrote:Jesse Phillips wrote:According to the documentation having & in a tag will be turned to & http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_xml.html#text I observe that this is not the case. And if an attribute contains &=
it is turned into &amp; What is the best way to receive the same output for both. The code that follows outputs Attr: What &amp; Up Elem: What & Up *testfile.xml:* <?xml version=3D"1.0" encoding=3D"utf-8"?> <Tests> =A0 =A0 <Test thing=3D"What & Up">What & Up</Test> </Tests>
Attr: What & Up Elem: What & Up The best place for bug reports is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ Stewart.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3200 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3201
The xml parsing code in D2 could use some love and care. =A0It was origin=
written by Janice who seems to have dropped off the face of the planet. =
little more than a first draft with serious performance problems and seve=
important bugs. Anyone want to volunteer to invest some time in improving it?
I don't mean to shoot down the idea? But Tango already has three XML parsers which are, like, the fastest. Ever. http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/04/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs/ I'm just saying, it'd seem like pointless duplication of effort with such parsers _already available_. If it could be relicensed, I'd say that's the best route.
Jul 21 2009
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Brad Roberts<braddr puremagic.com> wrote:Jesse Phillips wrote:On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:37:38 +0100, Stewart Gordon wrote:Jesse Phillips wrote:According to the documentation having & in a tag will be turned to & http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_xml.html#text I observe that this is not the case. And if an attribute contains & it is turned into &amp; What is the best way to receive the same output for both. The code that follows outputs Attr: What &amp; Up Elem: What & Up *testfile.xml:* <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Tests> <Test thing="What & Up">What & Up</Test> </Tests>
Attr: What & Up Elem: What & Up The best place for bug reports is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ Stewart.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3201
written by Janice who seems to have dropped off the face of the planet. It's little more than a first draft with serious performance problems and several important bugs. Anyone want to volunteer to invest some time in improving it?
I don't mean to shoot down the idea? But Tango already has three XML parsers which are, like, the fastest. Ever. http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/04/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs/ I'm just saying, it'd seem like pointless duplication of effort with such parsers _already available_. If it could be relicensed, I'd say that's the best route.
Relicensed and separable from the rest of Tango. It's been way too long since I looked at that code in Tango to recall any of its details. Basically I agree with you on this one. :)
Jul 21 2009