digitalmars.D.learn - Variant opArithmetic
- "cal" <callumenator gmail.com> Sep 18 2012
- Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> Sep 18 2012
- "cal" <callumenator gmail.com> Sep 18 2012
Variant tries to mimic D's built-in rules for arithmetic
conversions but:
import std.variant, std.stdio;
void main()
{
auto v1 = Variant(4.5f);
auto v2 = Variant(3.5f);
writeln((v1+v2).type()); // double
}
The reason is Variant doesn't try to convert to float in
opArithmetic (it's is easily fixed). But is it intentional?
Sep 18 2012
On 9/18/12 1:36 PM, cal wrote:Variant tries to mimic D's built-in rules for arithmetic conversions but: import std.variant, std.stdio; void main() { auto v1 = Variant(4.5f); auto v2 = Variant(3.5f); writeln((v1+v2).type()); // double } The reason is Variant doesn't try to convert to float in opArithmetic (it's is easily fixed). But is it intentional?
I wrote this: writeln(typeof(4.5f + 3.5f).stringof); To my surprise, the reported type was float, not double. Well that means it's a bug in Variant, could you please make a bug report (and hopefully a pull request fixing it)? Thanks, Andrei
Sep 18 2012
On Tuesday, 18 September 2012 at 19:02:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:On 9/18/12 1:36 PM, cal wrote:Variant tries to mimic D's built-in rules for arithmetic conversions but: import std.variant, std.stdio; void main() { auto v1 = Variant(4.5f); auto v2 = Variant(3.5f); writeln((v1+v2).type()); // double } The reason is Variant doesn't try to convert to float in opArithmetic (it's is easily fixed). But is it intentional?
I wrote this: writeln(typeof(4.5f + 3.5f).stringof); To my surprise, the reported type was float, not double. Well that means it's a bug in Variant, could you please make a bug report (and hopefully a pull request fixing it)? Thanks, Andrei
Sure thing
Sep 18 2012









Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> 