• Wyverex <wyverex.cypher gmail.com> Aug 20 2008
• BCS <ao pathlink.com> Aug 20 2008
• Wyverex <wyverex.cypher gmail.com> Aug 20 2008
• JAnderson <ask me.com> Aug 20 2008

Wyverex <wyverex.cypher gmail.com> writes:

What benefit is there in using pure?  Messed around with it on some 
simple functions and there is no difference reported by the profiler..

So why use pure, and when should we use it?

BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:

Reply to wyverex,

 What benefit is there in using pure?  Messed around with it on some
 simple functions and there is no difference reported by the profiler..
 
 So why use pure,


I don't 

 and when should we use it?


After it gets implemented (IIRC)

Wyverex <wyverex.cypher gmail.com> writes:

BCS wrote:
 Reply to wyverex,
 
 What benefit is there in using pure?  Messed around with it on some
 simple functions and there is no difference reported by the profiler..

 So why use pure,


 I don't
 and when should we use it?


 After it gets implemented (IIRC)
 
 


Blah..

JAnderson <ask me.com> writes:

Wyverex wrote:
 BCS wrote:
 Reply to wyverex,

 What benefit is there in using pure?  Messed around with it on some
 simple functions and there is no difference reported by the profiler..

 So why use pure,


 I don't
 and when should we use it?


 After it gets implemented (IIRC)


 Blah..


I think the reason its there is so people can start using it in there 
code and they won't have backwoods compatibility issues when it is 
actually implemented.