digitalmars.D.learn - Static struct assign
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Mar 11 2010
- Ellery Newcomer <ellery-newcomer utulsa.edu> Mar 11 2010
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Mar 11 2010
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pelle_M=E5nsson?= <pelle.mansson gmail.com> Mar 11 2010
While trying to create a safe int, I have found a problem, this is reduced code:
struct Foo {
int x;
static Foo opAssign(int value) { return Foo(value); }
}
void main() {
Foo y = 0;
}
The compiler prints:
test.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (0) of type int to Foo
While this generates no error:
Foo y; y = 0; is OK.
Do you know if there is a way to do that?
Bye and thank you,
bearophile
Mar 11 2010
On 03/11/2010 11:22 AM, bearophile wrote:While trying to create a safe int, I have found a problem, this is reduced code: struct Foo { int x; static Foo opAssign(int value) { return Foo(value); } } void main() { Foo y = 0; } The compiler prints: test.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (0) of type int to Foo While this generates no error: Foo y; y = 0; is OK. Do you know if there is a way to do that? Bye and thank you, bearophile
define opCall in Foo
Mar 11 2010
Ellery Newcomer:define opCall in Foo
Thank you :-) I need to practice more with operator overload. Bye, bearophile
Mar 11 2010
On 03/11/2010 06:22 PM, bearophile wrote:While trying to create a safe int, I have found a problem, this is reduced code: struct Foo { int x; static Foo opAssign(int value) { return Foo(value); } } void main() { Foo y = 0; } The compiler prints: test.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (0) of type int to Foo While this generates no error: Foo y; y = 0; is OK. Do you know if there is a way to do that? Bye and thank you, bearophile
I think you want a constructor. struct Foo { int x; static Foo opAssign(int value) { return Foo(value); } this(int i) {x = i;} }
Mar 11 2010









bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> 