digitalmars.D.learn - Static array size limit
- simendsjo <simen.endsjo pandavre.com> Apr 02 2011
- simendsjo <simen.endsjo pandavre.com> Apr 02 2011
- Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> Apr 02 2011
- simendsjo <simen.endsjo pandavre.com> Apr 02 2011
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Apr 02 2011
- simendsjo <simen.endsjo pandavre.com> Apr 02 2011
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Apr 02 2011
- "Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy yahoo.com> Apr 04 2011
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Apr 04 2011
- simendsjo <simen.endsjo pandavre.com> Apr 04 2011
- "Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy yahoo.com> Apr 04 2011
- Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> Apr 04 2011
http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html says static arrays are limited to 16mb, but I can only allocate 1mb. My fault, or bug? enum size = (16 * 1024 * 1024) / int.sizeof; //int[size] a; // Error: index 4194304 overflow for static array enum size2 = (16 * 1000 * 1000) / int.sizeof; //int[size2] b; // Stack Overflow //int[250_001] c; // Stack Overflow int[250_000] d; // ok
Apr 02 2011
This is using dmd 2.052 on windows by the way.
Apr 02 2011
On 2011-04-02 06:21, simendsjo wrote:http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html says static arrays are limited to 16mb, but I can only allocate 1mb. My fault, or bug? enum size = (16 * 1024 * 1024) / int.sizeof; //int[size] a; // Error: index 4194304 overflow for static array enum size2 = (16 * 1000 * 1000) / int.sizeof; //int[size2] b; // Stack Overflow //int[250_001] c; // Stack Overflow int[250_000] d; // ok
Well, 16 * 1024 * 1024 certainly isn't going to work when it's an array ints. An int is 4 bytes. So, the max would be more like 4 * 1024 * 1024, and that's assuming no overhead (which there may or may not be). Now, 4 * 1024 * 1024 is 4_194_304, which is definitely more than 250_000, so if 16mb is indeed the limit, I don't know why you can't create one greater than 250_000, but you're _not_ going to be able to create one of length 16 * 1024 * 10243. That would be 64mb. - Jonathan M Davis
Apr 02 2011
I think you missed my "/int.sizeof" at the end. enum size = (16*1024*1024)/int.sizeof; int[size] a; // "Error index overflow for static" as expected int[size-1] b; // stack overflow int[250_001] c; // stack overflow int[250_000] d; // ok
Apr 02 2011
simendsjo:http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html says static arrays are limited to 16mb, but I can only allocate 1mb. My fault, or bug?
It accepts 4_000_000 ints, but not (16 * 1024 * 1024) / int.sizeof = 4_194_304 ints. I don't know why it's designed this way... I'd like 4_194_304 ints. Bye, bearophile
Apr 02 2011
On 02.04.2011 16:45, bearophile wrote:simendsjo:http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html says static arrays are limited to 16mb, but I can only allocate 1mb. My fault, or bug?
It accepts 4_000_000 ints, but not (16 * 1024 * 1024) / int.sizeof = 4_194_304 ints. I don't know why it's designed this way... I'd like 4_194_304 ints. Bye, bearophile
The main problem is that it gives a Stack Overflow already at 250_001
Apr 02 2011
simendsjo:The main problem is that it gives a Stack Overflow already at 250_001
I meant with the array as a global variable. The stack on Windows can be set very large too, with -L/STACK:10000000 Bye, bearophile
Apr 02 2011
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:45:51 -0400, bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> wrote:simendsjo:http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html says static arrays are limited to 16mb, but I can only allocate 1mb. My fault, or bug?
It accepts 4_000_000 ints, but not (16 * 1024 * 1024) / int.sizeof = 4_194_304 ints. I don't know why it's designed this way... I'd like 4_194_304 ints.
That would be 16 MiB. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte -Steve
Apr 04 2011
Steven Schveighoffer:That would be 16 MiB. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte
Then I think 16 MiB are more useful than 16_000_000 bytes. Bye, bearophile
Apr 04 2011
And it seems also Walter is meaning mebibytes: enum size = (16*1024*1024)/int.sizeof; static assert(!__traits(compiles, int[size])); static assert(__traits(compiles, int[size-1]));
Apr 04 2011
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:43:03 -0400, bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> wrote:Steven Schveighoffer:That would be 16 MiB. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte
Then I think 16 MiB are more useful than 16_000_000 bytes.
Seems arbitrary to me. I'm sure some people feel 32MB would be more useful. -Steve
Apr 04 2011
On 2011-04-04 06:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:45:51 -0400, bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> wrote:simendsjo:http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html says static arrays are limited to 16mb, but I can only allocate 1mb. My fault, or bug?
It accepts 4_000_000 ints, but not (16 * 1024 * 1024) / int.sizeof = 4_194_304 ints. I don't know why it's designed this way... I'd like 4_194_304 ints.
That would be 16 MiB. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte
Most of the time that anyone talks about megabytes, they mean mebibytes, so I think that it's unrealistic to expect that anyone is going to see 16MB and think that it means 16_000_000 bytes reather than 16_777_216 bytes. - Jonathan M Davis
Apr 04 2011









simendsjo <simen.endsjo pandavre.com> 