www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  
Archives
D Programming
digitalmars.D
digitalmars.D.bugs
digitalmars.D.dtl
digitalmars.D.ide
digitalmars.D.dwt
digitalmars.D.announce
digitalmars.D.learn
digitalmars.D.debugger
D.gnu
D
C/C++ Programming
c++
c++.announce
c++.atl
c++.beta
c++.chat
c++.command-line
c++.dos
c++.dos.16-bits
c++.dos.32-bits
c++.idde
c++.mfc
c++.rtl
c++.stl
c++.stl.hp
c++.stl.port
c++.stl.sgi
c++.stlsoft
c++.windows
c++.windows.16-bits
c++.windows.32-bits
c++.wxwindows
digitalmars.empire
digitalmars.DMDScript
electronics

digitalmars.D.learn - Re: Is there a reason for default-int?

reply =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tomek_Sowi=f1ski?= <just ask.me> writes:
Don Wrote:

 There's now an Error type in the compiler. It's gradually filtering its 
 way through the compiler.



The one from object.di or the compiler makes up its own dummy type to say
"something wrong"?
Jan 02 2010
parent Don <nospam nospam.com> writes:
Tomek Sowiński wrote:

 Don Wrote:

 There's now an Error type in the compiler. It's gradually filtering its 
 way through the compiler.



 The one from object.di or the compiler makes up its own dummy type to say
"something wrong"?



It's just an internal compiler thing, which does nothing except reduce 
the number of parasitic error messages spewed out by the compiler. You 
should never notice that it's there.
Jan 03 2010