• Paul (6/6) Jun 06 2012 I have and array string[string][string][string] that works great
• simendsjo (4/11) Jun 06 2012 As you say, AAs are unordered. Instead of a string, you could use
• Jonathan M Davis (7/15) Jun 06 2012 If you want an ordered map, then use std.container.RedBlackTree. It's a ...
• Era Scarecrow (5/20) Jun 07 2012 Agreed, it would get ugly and looks like difficult right off the

"Paul" <phshaffer gmail.com> writes:

I have and array string[string][string][string] that works great 
for everything I need except that they (assoc. arrays) don't 
maintain an order.  I need to maintain the order of entry.

Are there any work arounds that others have used?  I saw some 
tricks in the book for sorting a single dimensional assoc. array.

Thanks to all!

"simendsjo" <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 6 June 2012 at 14:04:17 UTC, Paul wrote:
 I have and array string[string][string][string] that works 
 great for everything I need except that they (assoc. arrays) 
 don't maintain an order.  I need to maintain the order of entry.

 Are there any work arounds that others have used?  I saw some 
 tricks in the book for sorting a single dimensional assoc. 
 array.

 Thanks to all!

As you say, AAs are unordered. Instead of a string, you could use 
a struct that contains a position as well as the string and sort 
before you need to traverse the values in order.

"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg gmx.com> writes:

On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 16:04:14 Paul wrote:
 I have and array string[string][string][string] that works great
 for everything I need except that they (assoc. arrays) don't
 maintain an order. I need to maintain the order of entry.
 
 Are there any work arounds that others have used? I saw some
 tricks in the book for sorting a single dimensional assoc. array.
 
 Thanks to all!

If you want an ordered map, then use std.container.RedBlackTree. It's a little 
bit annoying to use as a map (you basically have to use it as a set of 
pairs/tuples which are ordered on their first member), but it's quite doable 
(and is what C++'s STL does internally with std::map). Chaining them like you 
seem to be trying to do though would probably get ugly though.

- Jonathan M Davis

"Era Scarecrow" <rtcvb32 yahoo.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 6 June 2012 at 17:05:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
 On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 16:04:14 Paul wrote:
 I have and array string[string][string][string] that works 
 great for everything I need except that they (assoc. arrays) 
 don't maintain an order. I need to maintain the order of entry.

 Are there any work arounds that others have used? I saw some 
 tricks in the book for sorting a single dimensional assoc. 
 array. Thanks to all!

 If you want an ordered map, then use 
 std.container.RedBlackTree. It's a little bit annoying to use 
 as a map (you basically have to use it as a set of pairs/tuples 
 which are ordered on their first member), but it's quite doable 
 (and is what C++'s STL does internally with std::map). Chaining 
 them like you seem to be trying to do though would probably get 
 ugly though.

  Agreed, it would get ugly and looks like difficult right off the 
bat, since RedBlackTree's are classes you'll need to initialize 
them on each level, or have a general purpose one with two 
purposes and they chain internally... Hmmm... maybe...