www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - Do we already have full compile time / runtime separation?

Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,
I've been trying to manage this on my own for like 2 days but still couldn'=
t=20
do that, and because my brain just suddenly turned-off, I would ask You for=
=20
some guidance.

The thing is:
I'd like to make some kind of messaging in my application. So, there is=20
=2D interface Msg
=2D classes that are implementing it, i.e. MsgWindowClose
=2D interface Provider for message publishers, i.e. MsgProviderWindowClose
=2D interface Listener for message subscibers i.e. MsgListenerWindowClose
=2D interface Handler for message filters i.e. bool MsgHandlerWindowClose.l=
og()
=2D interface Mediator for message passing between program classes, i.e.=20
MsgMediatorDMultiThreading() - which is using D messages btw.

Nothing related to D so far. Key thing is, that most of this Msg objects wi=
ll=20
be really generic, so I'm building object generator, i.e=20
MsgProviderGen!"WindowClose":
<code>
template MsgProviderGen(string MSG, Args...) {
=09
	const char[] MsgProviderGen =3D "class MsgProvider"~MSG~" : MsgProvider {"
	=09
			~"override Msg"~MSG~" getMsg() {"
				~"return new Msg"~MSG~";"
			~"}"
		=09
		~"}";
=09
}
</code>
Which will be bigger of course.

Then, for standard and generic messages i can easily define:
<code>
private import
	msg.msg,
	msg.provider.gen,
	msg.handler.gen;

class MsgWindowClose : Msg {
	=20
}
mixin(MsgProviderGen!"WindowClose");
</code>


So far so good, but then if I'd like to add
<code>mixin("immutable uint id=3D"~static_id~";")</code>
for each *class* (not object) I got a=20

PROBLEM:
Each compile-time variable has to be const, right? So I can't increment my=
=20
`static_id` each time I build a class (how many times template has generate=
d=20
provider/listener of this type). This wont let me statically check if each=
=20
listener has its provider.

Surely it's not the only use of this feature, For loosen coupling, I'd wish=
 to=20
add function that statically returns array of Msg defined in module. It isn=
't=20
an option without compile-time variables too.

Is it something about undefined module initialization?
Or maybe there is any way to overcome this problems, since I'm still new   =
D=20
language.

Ps. How to make associative array of dynamic arrays?
<code>MsgHandler[hash_t][] _handlers =3D new MsgHandler[hash_t][];</code>
wont work.

Thanks for help,
Mariusz Gliwi=C5=84ski
Dec 23 2010