www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - DMD [-O flag] vs. [memory allocation in a synchronized class]

reply realhet <real_het hotmail.com> writes:
Hi,

This code works well with the unoptimized compilation with DMD.

import std.array;

synchronized class Obj{
   private int[] arr;
   void trigger(){ arr.length += 1; }
}

void main(){
   auto k = new shared Obj;
   k.trigger;
}

And when I use the -O option, it shows the following error in the 
trigger() method:

core.exception.InvalidMemoryOperationError src\core\exception.d(696): Invalid
memory operation

Why? o.O
Jun 08
parent reply ketmar <ketmar ketmar.no-ip.org> writes:
worksforme with -O, and with -O -inline.
Jun 08
parent reply realhet <real_het hotmail.com> writes:
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 10:48:41 UTC, ketmar wrote:
 worksforme with -O, and with -O -inline.
I forgot to mention, that I'm generating win32 output. DMD32 D Compiler v2.074.0
Jun 08
parent reply ketmar <ketmar ketmar.no-ip.org> writes:
realhet wrote:

 On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 10:48:41 UTC, ketmar wrote:
 worksforme with -O, and with -O -inline.
I forgot to mention, that I'm generating win32 output. DMD32 D Compiler v2.074.0
mine: GNU/Linux, 32 bit, dmd git HEAD.
Jun 08
parent reply realhet <real_het hotmail.com> writes:
I've managed to narrow the problem even more:

//win32 dmd -O

class Obj{
   synchronized void trigger(){ new ubyte[1]; }
}

void main(){
   auto k = new shared Obj;
   k.trigger;
}

This time I got a more sophisticated error message:

object.Error (0): Access Violation
----------------
0x7272456D in SymInitialize
0x00402667
0x00402A97
0x00402998
0x004022A0
0x76F13744 in BaseThreadInitThunk
0x773B9E54 in RtlSetCurrentTransaction
0x773B9E1F in RtlSetCurrentTransaction
Jun 08
parent reply Ivan Kazmenko <gassa mail.ru> writes:
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 11:41:40 UTC, realhet wrote:
 I've managed to narrow the problem even more:

 //win32 dmd -O

 class Obj{
   synchronized void trigger(){ new ubyte[1]; }
 }

 void main(){
   auto k = new shared Obj;
   k.trigger;
 }

 This time I got a more sophisticated error message:

 object.Error (0): Access Violation
 ----------------
 0x7272456D in SymInitialize
 0x00402667
 0x00402A97
 0x00402998
 0x004022A0
 0x76F13744 in BaseThreadInitThunk
 0x773B9E54 in RtlSetCurrentTransaction
 0x773B9E1F in RtlSetCurrentTransaction
I can reproduce this under win32, and it breaks somewhere between 2.068.2 and 2.069.0. The move instructive message with "dmd -O -g": object.Error (0): Access Violation ---------------- 0x00000065 0x00402C33 in _d_newarrayU 0x004022EB in _d_newarrayT 0x00402A7F in scope void rt.dmain2._d_run_main(int, char**, extern (C) int function(char[][])*).runAll() 0x00402980 in _d_run_main 0x00402288 in main at C:\a.d(8) 0x757F336A in BaseThreadInitThunk 0x77409902 in RtlInitializeExceptionChain 0x774098D5 in RtlInitializeExceptionChain Perhaps a regression should be filed, or searched for, at issues.dlang.org. I can do it, but not right now, and would be glad if someone beats me to it. Ivan Kazmenko.
Jun 08
parent reply Ivan Kazmenko <gassa mail.ru> writes:
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 15:35:06 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
 Perhaps a regression should be filed, or searched for, at 
 issues.dlang.org.  I can do it, but not right now, and would be 
 glad if someone beats me to it.
Reported: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17481
Jun 08
parent realhet <real_het hotmail.com> writes:
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 17:39:41 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
 Reported: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17481
Thank You!
Jun 09