digitalmars.D.learn - Catching AVs on Windows
- Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com> Apr 13 2008
- "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> Apr 13 2008
- Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com> Apr 13 2008
- Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com> Apr 13 2008
Hi, Has anyone had any success trapping access violations on Windows and changing them into D exceptions? I created a function and passed it to SetUnhandledExceptionFilter, but my exception filter never triggered on the access violation. Thanks, Robert
Apr 13 2008
"Robert Fraser" <fraserofthenight gmail.com> wrote in message news:fttsdl$2nec$1 digitalmars.com...Hi, Has anyone had any success trapping access violations on Windows and changing them into D exceptions? I created a function and passed it to SetUnhandledExceptionFilter, but my exception filter never triggered on the access violation. Thanks, Robert
They already are, IIRC. They might not be converted to Exceptions, though, but I know you can catch them with catch(Object).
Apr 13 2008
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:"Robert Fraser" <fraserofthenight gmail.com> wrote in message news:fttsdl$2nec$1 digitalmars.com...Hi, Has anyone had any success trapping access violations on Windows and changing them into D exceptions? I created a function and passed it to SetUnhandledExceptionFilter, but my exception filter never triggered on the access violation. Thanks, Robert
They already are, IIRC. They might not be converted to Exceptions, though, but I know you can catch them with catch(Object).
Oh you're right! Thanks! Any way to make it throw an Exception (since I'm adding trace hooks to the Exception constructor)?
Apr 13 2008
Robert Fraser wrote:Jarrett Billingsley wrote:"Robert Fraser" <fraserofthenight gmail.com> wrote in message news:fttsdl$2nec$1 digitalmars.com...Hi, Has anyone had any success trapping access violations on Windows and changing them into D exceptions? I created a function and passed it to SetUnhandledExceptionFilter, but my exception filter never triggered on the access violation. Thanks, Robert
They already are, IIRC. They might not be converted to Exceptions, though, but I know you can catch them with catch(Object).
Oh you're right! Thanks! Any way to make it throw an Exception (since I'm adding trace hooks to the Exception constructor)?
Oops, never mind, it _is_ an exception. Now to figure out why it won't trace...
Apr 13 2008








Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight gmail.com>