www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - Adjacent Pairs Range

reply =?UTF-8?B?Ik5vcmRsw7Z3Ig==?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:
How do I most elegantly iterate all the adjacent pairs in an 
`InputRange` using Phobos?

Something like

     [1,2,3,4] => [(1,2), (2,3), (3,4)]
Sep 12 2015
next sibling parent reply Bahman Movaqar <Bahman BahmanM.com> writes:
On 09/12/2015 02:47 PM, "Nordlöw" wrote:
 How do I most elegantly iterate all the adjacent pairs in an
 `InputRange` using Phobos?
 
 Something like
 
     [1,2,3,4] => [(1,2), (2,3), (3,4)]
That's call `collate`ing IIRC. A quick solution would be using `std.range.transposed`: auto a = [1,2,3,4]; auto ll = [a, a[1..$]]; transpose(ll); // returns [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4], [4]] Though you have to take care of the dangling last element yourself. -- Bahman Movaqar
Sep 12 2015
parent reply =?UTF-8?B?Ik5vcmRsw7Z3Ig==?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:
On Saturday, 12 September 2015 at 10:35:41 UTC, Bahman Movaqar 
wrote:
 On 09/12/2015 02:47 PM, "Nordlöw" wrote:
 How do I most elegantly iterate all the adjacent pairs in an 
 `InputRange` using Phobos?
 
 Something like
 
     [1,2,3,4] => [(1,2), (2,3), (3,4)]
That's call `collate`ing IIRC. A quick solution would be using `std.range.transposed`: auto a = [1,2,3,4]; auto ll = [a, a[1..$]]; transpose(ll); // returns [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4], [4]]
InputRange please, not RandomAccessRanges ;)
Sep 12 2015
parent reply Bahman Movaqar <Bahman BahmanM.com> writes:
On 09/12/2015 03:09 PM, "Nordlöw" wrote:
 InputRange please, not RandomAccessRanges ;)
Oops! Here's one using only `InputRange` interface: T[][] collate(T)(T[] a) { alias CollateResult = Tuple!(T[][], "result", T, "tlHd"); CollateResult _collate(CollateResult collres) { if (!a.empty) { auto newTlHd = a.front; a.popFront(); return _collate( CollateResult( collres.result ~ [collres.tlHd, newTlHd], newTlHd ) ); } else { return collres; } } if (!a.empty) { auto tlHd = a.front; a.popFront(); return _collate( CollateResult([], tlHd) ).result; } else { return []; } } unittest { writeln([10, 20, 30].collate!int); } -- Bahman Movaqar
Sep 12 2015
next sibling parent Bahman Movaqar <Bahman BahmanM.com> writes:
On 09/12/2015 04:04 PM, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
 Oops!  Here's one using only `InputRange` interface:
I believe I need to warn you that I'm just learning D; so take my solution at your own risk :-) -- Bahman Movaqar
Sep 12 2015
prev sibling parent reply =?UTF-8?B?Ik5vcmRsw7Z3Ig==?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:
On Saturday, 12 September 2015 at 11:34:03 UTC, Bahman Movaqar 
wrote:
 On 09/12/2015 03:09 PM, "Nordlöw" wrote:
 InputRange please, not RandomAccessRanges ;)
Oops! Here's one using only `InputRange` interface:
I wrote my own as adjacentTuples and adjacentPairs: https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/range_ex.d#L702 Note: No yet extended to N > 2. An alternative naming would be overlappingTuples/Pairs.
Sep 12 2015
parent =?UTF-8?B?Ik5vcmRsw7Z3Ig==?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:
On Saturday, 12 September 2015 at 11:46:55 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
 I wrote my own as adjacentTuples and adjacentPairs:

 https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/range_ex.d#L702

 Note: No yet extended to N > 2.

 An alternative naming would be overlappingTuples/Pairs.
Should this go into Phobos?
Sep 12 2015
prev sibling next sibling parent reply deed <none none.none> writes:
On Saturday, 12 September 2015 at 10:17:19 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
 How do I most elegantly iterate all the adjacent pairs in an 
 `InputRange` using Phobos?

 Something like

     [1,2,3,4] => [(1,2), (2,3), (3,4)]
Why not just: zip(arr[0 .. $-1], arr[1 .. $]) ?
Sep 12 2015
parent =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 01:49:56 UTC, deed wrote:
 zip(arr[0 .. $-1], arr[1 .. $])

 ?
Assumes arrays. Better is zip(arr.dropOne, arr)
Sep 13 2015
prev sibling parent reply Sebastiaan Koppe <mail skoppe.eu> writes:
On Saturday, 12 September 2015 at 10:17:19 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
 How do I most elegantly iterate all the adjacent pairs in an 
 `InputRange` using Phobos?

 Something like

     [1,2,3,4] => [(1,2), (2,3), (3,4)]
What about using zip and a slice? ``` void main() { auto a = [1,2,3,4]; import std.range : zip; import std.stdio; writeln(a.zip(a[1..$])); // [Tuple!(int, int)(1, 2), Tuple!(int, int)(2, 3), Tuple!(int, int)(3, 4)] } ```
Sep 13 2015
parent reply Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 05:37:05 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe 
wrote:
 What about using zip and a slice?
Slicing requires a RandomAccessRange (Array). This is too restrictive. We want to change operations such as adjacentTuples with for example map and reduce without the need for temporary copies of the whole range. This is the thing about D's standard library. Read up on D's range concepts.
Sep 14 2015
next sibling parent Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 10:45:52 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
 restrictive. We want to change operations such as
Correction: We want to *chain* operations such as...
Sep 14 2015
prev sibling parent Sebastiaan Koppe <mail skoppe.eu> writes:
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 10:45:52 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
 On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 05:37:05 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe 
 wrote:
 What about using zip and a slice?
Slicing requires a RandomAccessRange (Array). This is too restrictive. We want to change operations such as adjacentTuples with for example map and reduce without the need for temporary copies of the whole range. This is the thing about D's standard library. Read up on D's range concepts.
dropOne then. I saw your adjacentTuples. Two questions: a) can't you use a ringbuffer instead of copy when N > 2? b) shouldn't front() return a range over that ringbuffer?
Sep 15 2015