digitalmars.D.learn - DMD compiler choking?
- Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net> <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> Apr 05 2006
- "Regan Heath" <regan netwin.co.nz> Apr 05 2006
- Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net> <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> Apr 05 2006
- kris <foo bar.com> Apr 05 2006
- John Demme <me teqdruid.com> Apr 05 2006
- Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net> <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> Apr 05 2006
- "Regan Heath" <regan netwin.co.nz> Apr 05 2006
- "Regan Heath" <regan netwin.co.nz> Apr 05 2006
- Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net> <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> Apr 05 2006
- Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net> <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> Apr 05 2006
- Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net> <Jeremy_member pathlink.com> Apr 05 2006
- "Regan Heath" <regan netwin.co.nz> Apr 06 2006
- Don Clugston <dac nospam.com.au> Apr 06 2006
- Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> Apr 06 2006
- James Dunne <james.jdunne gmail.com> Apr 06 2006
- Hasan Aljudy <hasan.aljudy gmail.com> Apr 06 2006
- Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji gmail.com> Apr 07 2006
- Justin C Calvarese <technocrat7 gmail.com> Apr 07 2006
I've been dabbling around with D source code for a while, but never actually tried to compile anything just yet. I finally got around to compiling one of my projects, and run into this error on the very first class definition I have (if I comment out any class with /+ +/, it always occurs on the very next class definition in the file): data.d(45): identifier 'Object' is not defined data.d(45): Object is used as a type What's worse, however, is that the compiler is encountering an assertion failure: Assertion failure: 'b->type->ty == Tclass' on line 284 in file 'class.c' ..which leads me to believe that the dmd compiler itself is flaking out. Any insights?
Apr 05 2006
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 04:48:07 +0000 (UTC), Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:I've been dabbling around with D source code for a while, but never actually tried to compile anything just yet. I finally got around to compiling one of my projects, and run into this error on the very first class definition I have (if I comment out any class with /+ +/, it always occurs on the very next class definition in the file): data.d(45): identifier 'Object' is not defined data.d(45): Object is used as a type What's worse, however, is that the compiler is encountering an assertion failure: Assertion failure: 'b->type->ty == Tclass' on line 284 in file 'class.c' ..which leads me to believe that the dmd compiler itself is flaking out. Any insights?
If you post a cut-down (yet complete) code example that exhibits the problem you'll get a faster response :) Regan
Apr 05 2006
If you post a cut-down (yet complete) code example that exhibits the problem you'll get a faster response :) Regan
Okay. ;-) /******************************************************************************* TEST FILE - test.d *******************************************************************************/ module test; class MyClass { } int main() { return 0; }
Apr 05 2006
Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net> wrote:If you post a cut-down (yet complete) code example that exhibits the problem you'll get a faster response :) Regan
Okay. ;-) /******************************************************************************* TEST FILE - test.d *******************************************************************************/ module test; class MyClass { } int main() { return 0; }
I'd say you've somehow got a broken installation? Sounds like the compiler cannot find the default -I path (usually pointing to dmd/src/phobos)
Apr 05 2006
Jeremy Gibson wrote:If you post a cut-down (yet complete) code example that exhibits the problem you'll get a faster response :) Regan
Okay. ;-) /******************************************************************************* TEST FILE - test.d
module test; class MyClass { } int main() { return 0; }
Sounds like the compiler doesn't know where to look for the library source code. After you extract dmd.zip, you have to edit (dmd.conf on unix sc.ini) on windows and give DMD the directory where the phobos library source is (it comes with the compiler). ~John Demme
Apr 05 2006
Sounds like the compiler doesn't know where to look for the library source code. After you extract dmd.zip, you have to edit (dmd.conf on unix sc.ini) on windows and give DMD the directory where the phobos library source is (it comes with the compiler). ~John Demme
To install the compiler, I extracted both dmd.zip and dmc.zip into my C:\dev folder, such that the defaults should have worked just fine, assuming the % P% evaluates correctly to the path to the current file as it's supposed to. Since I didn't trust that completely, though, I just manually set the paths to the following, replacing the relative paths with absolute paths, in order to match up to the extracted paths precisely: <sc.ini> [Version] version=7.51 Build 020 [Environment] LIB="C:\dev\dmd\lib;C:\dev\dm\lib" DFLAGS="-I C:\dev\dmd\src\phobos" LINKCMD="C:\dev\dm\bin\link.exe" ..But I still have no luck -- the same errors are being thrown on compilation. I just tried redownloading the compiler, also with no luck. Maybe it just hates me? ;-) --JT
Apr 05 2006
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 05:35:16 +0000 (UTC), Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:Sounds like the compiler doesn't know where to look for the library source code. After you extract dmd.zip, you have to edit (dmd.conf on unix sc.ini) on windows and give DMD the directory where the phobos library source is (it comes with the compiler). ~John Demme
To install the compiler, I extracted both dmd.zip and dmc.zip into my C:\dev folder, such that the defaults should have worked just fine, assuming the % P% evaluates correctly to the path to the current file as it's supposed to. Since I didn't trust that completely, though, I just manually set the paths to the following, replacing the relative paths with absolute paths, in order to match up to the extracted paths precisely: <sc.ini> [Version] version=7.51 Build 020 [Environment] LIB="C:\dev\dmd\lib;C:\dev\dm\lib" DFLAGS="-I C:\dev\dmd\src\phobos" LINKCMD="C:\dev\dm\bin\link.exe" ..But I still have no luck -- the same errors are being thrown on compilation. I just tried redownloading the compiler, also with no luck. Maybe it just hates me? ;-)
Can you post the exact output of the compile. Regan
Apr 05 2006
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:38:42 +1200, Regan Heath <regan netwin.co.nz> wrote:On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 05:35:16 +0000 (UTC), Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:Sounds like the compiler doesn't know where to look for the library source code. After you extract dmd.zip, you have to edit (dmd.conf on unix sc.ini) on windows and give DMD the directory where the phobos library source is (it comes with the compiler). ~John Demme
To install the compiler, I extracted both dmd.zip and dmc.zip into my C:\dev folder, such that the defaults should have worked just fine, assuming the % P% evaluates correctly to the path to the current file as it's supposed to. Since I didn't trust that completely, though, I just manually set the paths to the following, replacing the relative paths with absolute paths, in order to match up to the extracted paths precisely: <sc.ini> [Version] version=7.51 Build 020 [Environment] LIB="C:\dev\dmd\lib;C:\dev\dm\lib" DFLAGS="-I C:\dev\dmd\src\phobos" LINKCMD="C:\dev\dm\bin\link.exe" ..But I still have no luck -- the same errors are being thrown on compilation. I just tried redownloading the compiler, also with no luck. Maybe it just hates me? ;-)
Can you post the exact output of the compile.
I ask because I wanted to see if there were any clues in the compiler/linker output that might suggest something. Have you added "C:\dev\dmd\bin" to your PATH? Regan
Apr 05 2006
Can you post the exact output of the compile. Regan
Pretty much exactly similar to the first post on the thread, but I'll include the command prompt and omit my witty banter for clarity. " C:\Documents and Settings\JT\My Documents\Programming\Alliance>dmd test.d -debug test.d(8): identifier 'Object' is not defined test.d(8): Object is used as a type Assertion failure: 'b->type->ty == Tclass' on line 286 in file 'class.c' abnormal program termination C:\Documents and Settings\JT\My Documents\Programming\Alliance> " I'm going to try adding those directories directly to my system's PATH environment variable and see if that'll help... --JT
Apr 05 2006
I'm going to try adding those directories directly to my system's PATH environment variable and see if that'll help...
Still nothing. Same errors through and through. (I had actually added C:\dev\dmd\bin to my path a long time ago -- I needed it in my path to be able to use the command-line compiler from my project folder, after all.) --JT
Apr 05 2006
Found the problem, and it was completely irrelevant to everything -- I had all of the environment variables set up correctly right from the very beginning. The problem? The object.d file in my project folder was overriding object.d in the Phobos directory. I renamed it to "gameobject.d" and everything works peachy-keen now. (I noticed this because after I uncommented some code in object.d, I started getting some errors in that file while I tried to compile the file test.d (which I posted) in the same folder. test.d does not import object.d at all, so something had to be automatically importing it. That's when it clicked.) This kind of name clash should probably be documented... =) --JT
Apr 05 2006
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 06:10:30 +0000 (UTC), Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:Found the problem, and it was completely irrelevant to everything -- I had all of the environment variables set up correctly right from the very beginning. The problem? The object.d file in my project folder was overriding object.d in the Phobos directory. I renamed it to "gameobject.d" and everything works peachy-keen now. (I noticed this because after I uncommented some code in object.d, I started getting some errors in that file while I tried to compile the file test.d (which I posted) in the same folder. test.d does not import object.d at all, so something had to be automatically importing it. That's when it clicked.) This kind of name clash should probably be documented... =)
Ahh, of course. Yeah, at least one other person has had this exact same problem. At the very least it should be documented. The compiler could error on compiling object.d, and/or refuse to create an object.o and/or refuse to link/see any object.o which is not in the main directory. (cross posted to bugs, not sure if it needs a bugzilla entry?) Regan
Apr 06 2006
Regan Heath wrote:On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 06:10:30 +0000 (UTC), Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:Found the problem, and it was completely irrelevant to everything -- I had all of the environment variables set up correctly right from the very beginning. The problem? The object.d file in my project folder was overriding object.d in the Phobos directory. I renamed it to "gameobject.d" and everything works peachy-keen now. (I noticed this because after I uncommented some code in object.d, I started getting some errors in that file while I tried to compile the file test.d (which I posted) in the same folder. test.d does not import object.d at all, so something had to be automatically importing it. That's when it clicked.) This kind of name clash should probably be documented... =)
Ahh, of course. Yeah, at least one other person has had this exact same problem. At the very least it should be documented. The compiler could error on compiling object.d, and/or refuse to create an object.o and/or refuse to link/see any object.o which is not in the main directory. (cross posted to bugs, not sure if it needs a bugzilla entry?)
Definitely. He got an internal compiler error!
Apr 06 2006
Regan Heath wrote:On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 06:10:30 +0000 (UTC), Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:Found the problem, and it was completely irrelevant to everything -- I had all of the environment variables set up correctly right from the very beginning. The problem? The object.d file in my project folder was overriding object.d in the Phobos directory. I renamed it to "gameobject.d" and everything works peachy-keen now. (I noticed this because after I uncommented some code in object.d, I started getting some errors in that file while I tried to compile the file test.d (which I posted) in the same folder. test.d does not import object.d at all, so something had to be automatically importing it. That's when it clicked.) This kind of name clash should probably be documented... =)
Ahh, of course. Yeah, at least one other person has had this exact same problem. At the very least it should be documented. The compiler could error on compiling object.d, and/or refuse to create an object.o and/or refuse to link/see any object.o which is not in the main directory.
For what it's worth, I've run into this with Ares before. DMD requires certain class definitions to be in object.d. If it needs them and they aren't there, the compiler crashes. But this should be reported, as the correct behavior would be to terminate with a helpful message. Sean
Apr 06 2006
Sean Kelly wrote:Regan Heath wrote:On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 06:10:30 +0000 (UTC), Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:Found the problem, and it was completely irrelevant to everything -- I had all of the environment variables set up correctly right from the very beginning. The problem? The object.d file in my project folder was overriding object.d in the Phobos directory. I renamed it to "gameobject.d" and everything works peachy-keen now. (I noticed this because after I uncommented some code in object.d, I started getting some errors in that file while I tried to compile the file test.d (which I posted) in the same folder. test.d does not import object.d at all, so something had to be automatically importing it. That's when it clicked.) This kind of name clash should probably be documented... =)
Ahh, of course. Yeah, at least one other person has had this exact same problem. At the very least it should be documented. The compiler could error on compiling object.d, and/or refuse to create an object.o and/or refuse to link/see any object.o which is not in the main directory.
For what it's worth, I've run into this with Ares before. DMD requires certain class definitions to be in object.d. If it needs them and they aren't there, the compiler crashes. But this should be reported, as the correct behavior would be to terminate with a helpful message. Sean
DMD's phobos should rename the object module class to something inconspicuous like '_d_object' or something to avoid naming conflicts with new programmers. :) (I just thought naming conflicts with new programmers was kinda funny) -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/MU/S d-pu s:+ a-->? C++++$ UL+++ P--- L+++ !E W-- N++ o? K? w--- O M-- V? PS PE Y+ PGP- t+ 5 X+ !R tv-->!tv b- DI++(+) D++ G e++>e h>--->++ r+++ y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ James Dunne
Apr 06 2006
James Dunne wrote:Sean Kelly wrote:Regan Heath wrote:On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 06:10:30 +0000 (UTC), Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:Found the problem, and it was completely irrelevant to everything -- I had all of the environment variables set up correctly right from the very beginning. The problem? The object.d file in my project folder was overriding object.d in the Phobos directory. I renamed it to "gameobject.d" and everything works peachy-keen now. (I noticed this because after I uncommented some code in object.d, I started getting some errors in that file while I tried to compile the file test.d (which I posted) in the same folder. test.d does not import object.d at all, so something had to be automatically importing it. That's when it clicked.) This kind of name clash should probably be documented... =)
Ahh, of course. Yeah, at least one other person has had this exact same problem. At the very least it should be documented. The compiler could error on compiling object.d, and/or refuse to create an object.o and/or refuse to link/see any object.o which is not in the main directory.
For what it's worth, I've run into this with Ares before. DMD requires certain class definitions to be in object.d. If it needs them and they aren't there, the compiler crashes. But this should be reported, as the correct behavior would be to terminate with a helpful message. Sean
DMD's phobos should rename the object module class to something inconspicuous like '_d_object' or something to avoid naming conflicts with new programmers. :) (I just thought naming conflicts with new programmers was kinda funny)
I think it should just go into std package, making it std.object This way it'll be very hard to make the above mentioned mistake without knowing what's going on.
Apr 06 2006
Hasan Aljudy wrote:James Dunne wrote:Sean Kelly wrote:Regan Heath wrote:On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 06:10:30 +0000 (UTC), Jeremy Gibson <jtgibson telus net Jeremy_member pathlink.com> wrote:Found the problem, and it was completely irrelevant to everything -- I had all of the environment variables set up correctly right from the very beginning. The problem? The object.d file in my project folder was overriding object.d in the Phobos directory. I renamed it to "gameobject.d" and everything works peachy-keen now. (I noticed this because after I uncommented some code in object.d, I started getting some errors in that file while I tried to compile the file test.d (which I posted) in the same folder. test.d does not import object.d at all, so something had to be automatically importing it. That's when it clicked.) This kind of name clash should probably be documented... =)
Ahh, of course. Yeah, at least one other person has had this exact same problem. At the very least it should be documented. The compiler could error on compiling object.d, and/or refuse to create an object.o and/or refuse to link/see any object.o which is not in the main directory.
For what it's worth, I've run into this with Ares before. DMD requires certain class definitions to be in object.d. If it needs them and they aren't there, the compiler crashes. But this should be reported, as the correct behavior would be to terminate with a helpful message. Sean
DMD's phobos should rename the object module class to something inconspicuous like '_d_object' or something to avoid naming conflicts with new programmers. :) (I just thought naming conflicts with new programmers was kinda funny)
I think it should just go into std package, making it std.object This way it'll be very hard to make the above mentioned mistake without knowing what's going on.
I'm all for this solution, for two reasons. Reason 1, I've personally had a project where I had a class whose most obvious natural name would be Object. Of course, I ended up calling it LObject, and renaming all its compliments with the L* prefix as well, for consistancy. It would've been nice not to have to. Reason 2, it solves the problem of what to do if I actually want to explicitly refer to the generic Object: just call it std.object.Object (perhaps with an alias of _D_Object?) -- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
Apr 07 2006
Hasan Aljudy wrote:James Dunne wrote:Sean Kelly wrote:Regan Heath wrote:
<snip>At the very least it should be documented. The compiler could error on compiling object.d, and/or refuse to create an object.o and/or refuse to link/see any object.o which is not in the main directory.
For what it's worth, I've run into this with Ares before. DMD requires certain class definitions to be in object.d. If it needs them and they aren't there, the compiler crashes. But this should be reported, as the correct behavior would be to terminate with a helpful message. Sean
DMD's phobos should rename the object module class to something inconspicuous like '_d_object' or something to avoid naming conflicts with new programmers. :) (I just thought naming conflicts with new programmers was kinda funny)
I think it should just go into std package, making it std.object This way it'll be very hard to make the above mentioned mistake without knowing what's going on.
I asked Walter to put object into std.object a long time ago. I don't think he ever responded to that request (i.e. if there's a reason why he won't do this, I don't remember what it is). I also think that gcstats.d, unittest.d, crc32.d, etc. should be moved into the std module (or into "internal" or "etc"). -- jcc7
Apr 07 2006









kris <foo bar.com> 