• Triften Chmil <Triften_member pathlink.com> Sep 13 2005
• "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> Sep 13 2005
• Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> Sep 13 2005
• Triften Chmil <Triften_member pathlink.com> Sep 14 2005
• Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> Sep 14 2005

Triften Chmil <Triften_member pathlink.com> writes:

I'm trying to compile a .d and make a .lib but the .lib seems to be missing
functions. I verified the behavior by generating a .lst and seeing that some
functions from the .d weren't in the .lst.

Specifically, I'm trying to compile a .lib for sdl_mixer. I got SDL_mixer.dll
from libsdl.org and 'sdl_mixer.d' from D-Porting. I ran 'dmd -c SDL_mixer.d' to
make sdl_mixer.obj, then 'lib -c -l sdl_mixer sdl_mixer.obj' to make the lib.
But then when I compile a simple program, at linking, I get errors for undefined
symbols. The functions mentioned are (prototyped at least) in sdl_mixer.d.

Is there an option in the compiler to keep the functions that are prototyped but
not defined? Or do I need to pass an option with the .dll name so that it can
verify that those functions really exist?

Thanks,
Triften Chmil

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> writes:

"Triften Chmil" <Triften_member pathlink.com> wrote in message 
news:dg6eak$14o1$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Is there an option in the compiler to keep the functions that are 
 prototyped but
 not defined? Or do I need to pass an option with the .dll name so that it 
 can
 verify that those functions really exist?


I really wish there were.  What you'll have to do instead is have two 
modules: sdl_mixer.d and sdl_mixer_imports.d.  Copy all the function 
prototypes of the undefined functions to sdl_mixer_imports.d.  place an 
"import sdl_mixer_imports;" statement at the top of sdl_mixer.d.  Compile 
_only_ sdl_mixer.d; do not compile sdl_mixer_imports.d.  Then make your lib. 
Those references should hopefully appear in your lib file. 

Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> writes:

Triften Chmil escribió:
 I'm trying to compile a .d and make a .lib but the .lib seems to be missing
 functions. I verified the behavior by generating a .lst and seeing that some
 functions from the .d weren't in the .lst.
 
 Specifically, I'm trying to compile a .lib for sdl_mixer. I got SDL_mixer.dll
 from libsdl.org and 'sdl_mixer.d' from D-Porting. I ran 'dmd -c SDL_mixer.d' to
 make sdl_mixer.obj, then 'lib -c -l sdl_mixer sdl_mixer.obj' to make the lib.
 But then when I compile a simple program, at linking, I get errors for
undefined
 symbols. The functions mentioned are (prototyped at least) in sdl_mixer.d.
 
 Is there an option in the compiler to keep the functions that are prototyped
but
 not defined? Or do I need to pass an option with the .dll name so that it can
 verify that those functions really exist?
 
 Thanks,
 Triften Chmil


You need to import the .dll in a .lib using 'lib', not creating a D module. 
Check the docs for the lib tool to know how to use it.

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal

Triften Chmil <Triften_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <dg7qqm$2h1m$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Carlos Santander says...
Triften Chmil escribió:
 I'm trying to compile a .d and make a .lib but the .lib seems to be missing
 functions. I verified the behavior by generating a .lst and seeing that some
 functions from the .d weren't in the .lst.
 
 Specifically, I'm trying to compile a .lib for sdl_mixer. I got SDL_mixer.dll
 from libsdl.org and 'sdl_mixer.d' from D-Porting. I ran 'dmd -c SDL_mixer.d' to
 make sdl_mixer.obj, then 'lib -c -l sdl_mixer sdl_mixer.obj' to make the lib.
 But then when I compile a simple program, at linking, I get errors for
undefined
 symbols. The functions mentioned are (prototyped at least) in sdl_mixer.d.
 
 Is there an option in the compiler to keep the functions that are prototyped
but
 not defined? Or do I need to pass an option with the .dll name so that it can
 verify that those functions really exist?
 
 Thanks,
 Triften Chmil


You need to import the .dll in a .lib using 'lib', not creating a D module. 
Check the docs for the lib tool to know how to use it.

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal


I don't see any mention of dll's on the doc page for 'lib'. Where does it talk
about this? Oh wait, I think I need to run COFF2OMF on the .lib I have.

Thanks,
Triften Chmil

Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> writes:

Triften Chmil escribió:
 
 
 I don't see any mention of dll's on the doc page for 'lib'. Where does it talk
 about this? Oh wait, I think I need to run COFF2OMF on the .lib I have.
 
 Thanks,
 Triften Chmil


My bad, sorry. It's implib, like Jarrett said.

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal