digitalmars.D - [joke] D type system and making love in a canoe?
- Justin Johansson <no spam.com> Oct 12 2010
- Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au gmail.com> Oct 12 2010
- "Simen kjaeraas" <simen.kjaras gmail.com> Oct 12 2010
- Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au gmail.com> Oct 12 2010
- "Simen kjaeraas" <simen.kjaras gmail.com> Oct 12 2010
- retard <re tard.com.invalid> Oct 13 2010
What's the similarity between the D type system and making love in a canoe? Adapted from an Australian joke about U.S. beer (orig. Miller) (Ozzie's revere their beer), the answer is .. <scroll-down-for-answer/> They are both f??king close to water. :-) - JJ
Oct 12 2010
On 12/10/10 4:01 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:What's the similarity between the D type system and making love in a canoe? They are both f??king close to water. :-) - JJ
At the risk of sounding stupid: I don't get it :-(
Oct 12 2010
Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au gmail.com> wrote:On 12/10/10 4:01 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:What's the similarity between the D type system and making love in a canoe? They are both f??king close to water. :-) - JJ
At the risk of sounding stupid: I don't get it :-(
Making love is often equated with the act of copulation, in the vernacular called 'fucking'. In addition, that very same word is used as an intensifying adjective, in the same way as the word 'very'. Hence, making love in a canoe is akin to copulating in the adjacent to water, and D's type system is (by the original poster) considered as having the same structural integrity as H2O. -- Simen
Oct 12 2010
On 12/10/10 6:58 PM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:Making love is often equated with the act of copulation, in the vernacular called 'fucking'. In addition, that very same word is used as an intensifying adjective, in the same way as the word 'very'.
I got that bit :-)Hence, making love in a canoe is akin to copulating in the adjacent to water, and D's type system is (by the original poster) considered as having the same structural integrity as H2O.
I've never heard a type system being compared to water :-/ Even still, what makes D's type system watery?
Oct 12 2010
Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au gmail.com> wrote:On 12/10/10 6:58 PM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:Making love is often equated with the act of copulation, in the vernacular called 'fucking'. In addition, that very same word is used as an intensifying adjective, in the same way as the word 'very'.
I got that bit :-)
Glad to hear that. :pHence, making love in a canoe is akin to copulating in the adjacent to water, and D's type system is (by the original poster) considered as having the same structural integrity as H2O.
I've never heard a type system being compared to water :-/ Even still, what makes D's type system watery?
I believe this is related to the post about the type of null. Seeing as how null has no type, or at least none we may use, it is a hole in the system, reducing its value in the eyes of some people. The original joke was about beer, which is easier to compare to water - that means it is thin, without taste or other properties considered positive in beer. Back to the type system, such being watery would indicate it is weak, ad-hoc, full of holes, or otherwise in an unfortunate condition. -- Simen
Oct 12 2010
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:01:31 +1100, Justin Johansson wrote:What's the similarity between the D type system and making love in a canoe? Adapted from an Australian joke about U.S. beer (orig. Miller) (Ozzie's revere their beer), the answer is .. <scroll-down-for-answer/> They are both f??king close to water. :-) - JJ
Next time you could use few more blank lines between the question and answer. You know, 2560x1600 monitors are getting more and more popular. The post uses about 50% of the vertical space on my screen and I'm using "large" fonts.
Oct 13 2010









Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au gmail.com> 