digitalmars.D - is D too modern for Emacs?
- Gour D. (13/13) Oct 06 2010 Hello!
- Andrei Alexandrescu (7/17) Oct 06 2010 I'm using d-mode.el everyday and it's of good quality. 2007 is the
- Gour D. (14/15) Oct 06 2010 Andrei> I'm using d-mode.el everyday and it's of good quality.=20
- Daniel Gibson (3/21) Oct 06 2010 http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsDMode
- Gour D. (12/13) Oct 06 2010 Daniel> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsDMode
- Russel Winder (19/21) Oct 08 2010 Grrr.... (minor rant in next paragraph.)
- Simen kjaeraas (4/15) Oct 08 2010 Dsource.org?
- Russel Winder (14/33) Oct 09 2010 It seems dsource.org has a prejudice against Bazaar :-(
- klickverbot (4/6) Oct 09 2010 Well, not really agreed – recently, a few large projects (LDC, QtD) ha...
- bioinfornatics (3/3) Oct 09 2010 gitoriouse is good and open source, you need use git as vcs
Hello! After exploring preliminary stuff in regard to the feasibility to adopt D as our next project's programming language, it's time to check about tools/editors support... So, I'm a little bit surprise what is the reason the newest entry on=20 http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsEditor page says: Updated Mar 2, 2007 by Bill Baxter Is it really that D is too modern for Emacs? Sincerely, Gour --=20 Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ----------------------------------------------------------------
Oct 06 2010
On 10/6/10 12:30 CDT, Gour D. wrote:Hello! After exploring preliminary stuff in regard to the feasibility to adopt D as our next project's programming language, it's time to check about tools/editors support... So, I'm a little bit surprise what is the reason the newest entry on http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsEditor page says: Updated Mar 2, 2007 by Bill Baxter Is it really that D is too modern for Emacs? Sincerely, GourI'm using d-mode.el everyday and it's of good quality. 2007 is the creation date, it was last updated one year later (see http://www.billbaxter.com/etc/d-mode.el). Bill and I have modified it a couple of times and I think I messed with mine a bit without committing (I think I added a keyword or so). You should be in good shape with it. Andrei
Oct 06 2010
"Gour D." <gour atmarama.net> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:38:12 -0500Andrei> I'm using d-mode.el everyday and it's of good quality.=20 /me is very happy hearing such news :-) Andrei> 2007 is the creation date, it was last updated one year later Andrei> (see http://www.billbaxter.com/etc/d-mode.el). Bill and I have Andrei> modified it a couple of times and I think I messed with mine a Andrei> bit without committing (I think I added a keyword or so). You Andrei> should be in good shape with it. Cool. It would be nice to have more up-to-date info on wiki. Sincerely, Gour --=20 Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ----------------------------------------------------------------"Andrei" =3D=3D Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Oct 06 2010
Gour D. schrieb:Hello! After exploring preliminary stuff in regard to the feasibility to adopt D as our next project's programming language, it's time to check about tools/editors support... So, I'm a little bit surprise what is the reason the newest entry on http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsEditor page says: Updated Mar 2, 2007 by Bill Baxter Is it really that D is too modern for Emacs? Sincerely, Gourhttp://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsDMode Seems to be a bit more up to date.. there is a patch from august 2009
Oct 06 2010
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:39:47 +0200Daniel> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsDMode Daniel> Seems to be a bit more up to date.. there is a patch from Daniel> august 2009 Patching failed, so I had to manually did it...however with the patch it invokes debugger, while the plain file kind a works (tested on "Hello world"). Sincerely, Gour --=20 Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ----------------------------------------------------------------"Daniel" =3D=3D Daniel Gibson wrote:
Oct 06 2010
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 19:39 +0200, Daniel Gibson wrote:http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsDMode Seems to be a bit more up to date.. there is a patch from august 2009Grrr.... (minor rant in next paragraph.) Why is it that programmers can even think that a wiki is a suitable place to put code and patches? Surely the only sane place for code is in a version control repository? So let us assume that a Bazaar branch, Mercurial repository or Git repository gets created to hold this stuff, allowing for an Emacs 23 branch, where is the right place to host it, Launchpad, BitBucket, GitHub? =20 --=20 Russel. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n= et 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
Oct 08 2010
Russel Winder <russel russel.org.uk> wrote:On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 19:39 +0200, Daniel Gibson wrote:Dsource.org? -- Simenhttp://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsDMode Seems to be a bit more up to date.. there is a patch from august 2009Grrr.... (minor rant in next paragraph.) Why is it that programmers can even think that a wiki is a suitable place to put code and patches? Surely the only sane place for code is in a version control repository? So let us assume that a Bazaar branch, Mercurial repository or Git repository gets created to hold this stuff, allowing for an Emacs 23 branch, where is the right place to host it, Launchpad, BitBucket, GitHub?
Oct 08 2010
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 20:59 +0200, Simen kjaeraas wrote:Russel Winder <russel russel.org.uk> wrote: =20It seems dsource.org has a prejudice against Bazaar :-( So putting a Mercurial repository with this source code on dsource.org is the thing that is agreed? I guess this means making a new project? --=20 Russel. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n= et 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winderOn Wed, 2010-10-06 at 19:39 +0200, Daniel Gibson wrote:=20 Dsource.org?http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsDMode Seems to be a bit more up to date.. there is a patch from august 2009Grrr.... (minor rant in next paragraph.) Why is it that programmers can even think that a wiki is a suitable place to put code and patches? Surely the only sane place for code is in a version control repository? So let us assume that a Bazaar branch, Mercurial repository or Git repository gets created to hold this stuff, allowing for an Emacs 23 branch, where is the right place to host it, Launchpad, BitBucket, GitHub?
Oct 09 2010
On 10/9/10 12:33 PM, Russel Winder wrote:So putting a Mercurial repository with this source code on dsource.org is the thing that is agreed? I guess this means making a new project?Well, not really agreed – recently, a few large projects (LDC, QtD) have migrated their sources away from DSource because of the constant stability troubles with DSource…
Oct 09 2010
gitoriouse is good and open source, you need use git as vcs They are bitbucket with mercurial but the service has often a problem, less than dsource i agree.
Oct 09 2010