www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.ide - DDT 0.8.0 released

reply Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+dng gmail.com> writes:
Something for the weekend:

A new version of DDT - D Development Tools is out.
Some minor improvements and some important fixes. Please take the time 
to read the Changelog:

http://code.google.com/p/ddt/wiki/ChangeLog#DDT_0.8.0_%282013-08-30%29

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
Aug 30 2013
next sibling parent reply "ilya-stromberg" <ilya-stromberg-2009 yandex.ru> writes:
On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 Something for the weekend:

 A new version of DDT - D Development Tools is out.
 Some minor improvements and some important fixes. Please take 
 the time to read the Changelog:

 http://code.google.com/p/ddt/wiki/ChangeLog#DDT_0.8.0_%282013-08-30%29

 Updated DDT to latest version of DLTK (version 5.0, from 
 Eclipse Kepler).

Does DLTK (Dynamic Languages Toolkit) 3.0 still supported?
Sep 02 2013
parent reply Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+dng gmail.com> writes:
On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 Something for the weekend:

 A new version of DDT - D Development Tools is out.
 Some minor improvements and some important fixes. Please take the time
 to read the Changelog:

 http://code.google.com/p/ddt/wiki/ChangeLog#DDT_0.8.0_%282013-08-30%29

 Updated DDT to latest version of DLTK (version 5.0, from Eclipse Kepler).

Does DLTK (Dynamic Languages Toolkit) 3.0 still supported?

No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 . -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
Sep 02 2013
parent reply Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+dng gmail.com> writes:
On 02/09/2013 12:38, eles wrote:
 On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:42:41 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:

No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .

What prevents integration with the gdb and Eclipse debug interface?

Nothing, it is just a task no one has approached yet. I'm the only developer contributing so far, and I've been tied up with other more tasks I considered more prioritary. (the new parser, updating to latest Eclipse/DLTK release, etc.) There is a few improvements I want to make to the Code Completion engine, after that I should go to tackle debugger integration. -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
Sep 02 2013
parent reply Ary Borenszweig <ary esperanto.org.ar> writes:
On 9/2/13 2:02 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 12:38, eles wrote:
 On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:42:41 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:

No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .

What prevents integration with the gdb and Eclipse debug interface?

Nothing, it is just a task no one has approached yet. I'm the only developer contributing so far, and I've been tied up with other more tasks I considered more prioritary. (the new parser, updating to latest Eclipse/DLTK release, etc.) There is a few improvements I want to make to the Code Completion engine, after that I should go to tackle debugger integration.

Did you consider reusing some code from Descent for the debugger? I remember it was one part of the project that was separte from other parts and it worked quite well.
Sep 02 2013
parent Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+dng gmail.com> writes:
On 02/09/2013 23:00, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
 On 9/2/13 2:02 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 12:38, eles wrote:
 On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:42:41 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:

No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .

What prevents integration with the gdb and Eclipse debug interface?

Nothing, it is just a task no one has approached yet. I'm the only developer contributing so far, and I've been tied up with other more tasks I considered more prioritary. (the new parser, updating to latest Eclipse/DLTK release, etc.) There is a few improvements I want to make to the Code Completion engine, after that I should go to tackle debugger integration.

Did you consider reusing some code from Descent for the debugger? I remember it was one part of the project that was separte from other parts and it worked quite well.

I did consider that, but I haven't had the time yet to look into any of the debugger functionality. (and I don't want to just blindly copy the code without at least understanding and testing it sufficiently - and that takes time...) -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
Sep 03 2013
prev sibling parent "eles" <eles eles.com> writes:
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:42:41 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros 
 wrote:

No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .

What prevents integration with the gdb and Eclipse debug interface?
Sep 02 2013