• Georg Wrede <georg.wrede iki.fi> May 08 2009
• "Denis Koroskin" <2korden gmail.com> May 08 2009
• Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> May 08 2009
• Georg Wrede <georg.wrede iki.fi> May 08 2009

Georg Wrede <georg.wrede iki.fi> writes:

Walter, three years ago, when you last compiled htod, linux was an 
unfamiliar thing, right? Now that you're regularly roaming OSX, linux 
&co, would it be a big thing to make a non-windows version, too?

"Denis Koroskin" <2korden gmail.com> writes:

On Fri, 08 May 2009 16:21:13 +0400, Georg Wrede <georg.wrede iki.fi> wrote:

 Walter, three years ago, when you last compiled htod, linux was an  
 unfamiliar thing, right? Now that you're regularly roaming OSX, linux  
 &co, would it be a big thing to make a non-windows version, too?


Did you try BCD? http://www.dsource.org/projects/bcd

I never used it myself, but I hope I'll help you.

Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> writes:

Georg Wrede wrote:
 
 Walter, three years ago, when you last compiled htod, linux was an 
 unfamiliar thing, right? Now that you're regularly roaming OSX, linux 
 &co, would it be a big thing to make a non-windows version, too?


htod is built from the Digital Mars C compiler. In order to make one for 
Linux, it would have to support all of gcc's extensions which are used 
in the header files.

Georg Wrede <georg.wrede iki.fi> writes:

Walter Bright wrote:
 Georg Wrede wrote:
 Walter, three years ago, when you last compiled htod, linux was an 
 unfamiliar thing, right? Now that you're regularly roaming OSX, linux 
 &co, would it be a big thing to make a non-windows version, too?


 htod is built from the Digital Mars C compiler. In order to make one for 
 Linux, it would have to support all of gcc's extensions which are used 
 in the header files.


Ouch. Never saw that coming.