• JMNorris <nospam nospam.com> Apr 16 2008
• arnaud <arnaud.versini gmail.com> Apr 16 2008
• Frank Benoit <keinfarbton googlemail.com> Apr 16 2008
• Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup billbaxter.com> Apr 16 2008
• John Reimer <terminal.node gmail.com> Apr 16 2008
• JMNorris <nospam nospam.com> Apr 17 2008
• Jacob Carlborg <doobnet gmail.com> Apr 17 2008

As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
will be called dface.

-- 
JMNorris

I think it's a good idea, DMNorris

JMNorris a écrit :
 As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
 will be called dface.
 

JMNorris Wrote:

 As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
 will be called dface.


No, i have not plans to do this.

Frank Benoit wrote:
 JMNorris Wrote:
 
 As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
 will be called dface.


 No, i have not plans to do this.


Let's pretend it stands for something else in the D version.

J is for...Jiffy.
JFace let's you create an interFace in a Jiffy.  JFace.
It'll make you do a little Jiggy for Joy.
It might give you such a Jolly Jolt you'll want to Jot down all your 
code in D.  Time for a Jelly sandwich now...

--bb

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:22:05 +0000, JMNorris wrote:

 As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
 will be called dface.



Actually, it's a bit of a stretch calling DWT "DWT".  It's really just a 
port of SWT, not a new thing.  The name "DWT" has kind of stuck, though; 
so, among other things, it's here to stay.

JFace is another matter.  Naming it "DFace" would have implications that 
just wouldn't be suitable for any respectable D port. :)

-JJR

John Reimer <terminal.node gmail.com> wrote in news:fu6flc$1c2m$1
 digitalmars.com:

 On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:22:05 +0000, JMNorris wrote:
 
 As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
 will be called dface.


 
 Actually, it's a bit of a stretch calling DWT "DWT".  It's really just a 
 port of SWT, not a new thing.  The name "DWT" has kind of stuck, though; 
 so, among other things, it's here to stay.
 
 JFace is another matter.  Naming it "DFace" would have implications that 
 just wouldn't be suitable for any respectable D port. :)


Actually, I find it kinda cute--the D port with an attitude. :-)  At any 
rate, it's probably better than DJFace:  there's probably a reason the DJ 
is on radio rather than TV, and it's not his voice.

-- 
JMNorris

JMNorris wrote:
 As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
 will be called dface.