www.digitalmars.com Home | Search | C & C++ | D | DMDScript | News Groups | index | prev | next
Archives
D Programming
D
D.gnu
digitalmars.D
digitalmars.D.bugs
digitalmars.D.dtl
digitalmars.D.ide
digitalmars.D.dwt
digitalmars.D.announce
digitalmars.D.learn
digitalmars.D.debugger
C/C++ Programming
c++
c++.announce
c++.atl
c++.beta
c++.chat
c++.command-line
c++.dos
c++.dos.16-bits
c++.dos.32-bits
c++.idde
c++.mfc
c++.rtl
c++.stl
c++.stl.hp
c++.stl.port
c++.stl.sgi
c++.stlsoft
c++.windows
c++.windows.16-bits
c++.windows.32-bits
c++.wxwindows
digitalmars.empire
digitalmars.DMDScript
electronics

digitalmars.D.dwt - DWT updated to 3.3.2

↑ ↓ ← → Frank Benoit <keinfarbton googlemail.com> writes:
The source code was updated from SWT 3.3 to SWT 3.3.2 for both dwt-win 
and dwt-linux.

DWT 3.4 will take a while. I think it would be best to have the missing 
browser widget first completed.
Mar 19 2008
↑ ↓ ← → Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips gmail.com> writes:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:59:45 +0100, Frank Benoit wrote:


 The source code was updated from SWT 3.3 to SWT 3.3.2 for both dwt-win
 and dwt-linux.
 
 DWT 3.4 will take a while. I think it would be best to have the missing
 browser widget first completed.



Great news. I'll have to use it some more after break, I won't be taking 
my computer.
Mar 19 2008
↑ ↓ ← → Jacob Carlborg <doobnet gmail.com> writes:
Frank Benoit wrote:

 The source code was updated from SWT 3.3 to SWT 3.3.2 for both dwt-win 
 and dwt-linux.
 
 DWT 3.4 will take a while. I think it would be best to have the missing 
 browser widget first completed.



That's great news. What are different from SWT 3.3 to SWT 3.3.2?
Mar 20 2008
↑ ↓ ← → Frank Benoit <keinfarbton googlemail.com> writes:
Jacob Carlborg schrieb:

 That's great news. What are different from SWT 3.3 to SWT 3.3.2?



Not much, only very few bug fixes. See the timelines
Mar 20 2008