www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - ddoc private methods

reply kris <foo bar.com> writes:
Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently 
it now does? Can we turn that off again please?
Mar 16 2007
next sibling parent Walter Bright <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
kris wrote:
 Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently 
 it now does? Can we turn that off again please?

It's not supposed to. If you have an example, please submit to bugzilla.
Mar 16 2007
prev sibling parent reply BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:
Reply to kris,

 Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently
 it now does? Can we turn that off again please?
 

Can we please get a flag that will turn this on and off??? I have wanted this for some time.
Mar 17 2007
next sibling parent Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji gmail.com> writes:
BCS wrote:
 Reply to kris,
 
 Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently
 it now does? Can we turn that off again please?

Can we please get a flag that will turn this on and off??? I have wanted this for some time.

Ditto. -- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
Mar 17 2007
prev sibling parent Ary Manzana <ary esperanto.org.ar> writes:
BCS escribió:
 Reply to kris,
 
 Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently
 it now does? Can we turn that off again please?

Can we please get a flag that will turn this on and off??? I have wanted this for some time.

Why not select the least protection level shown in ddoc: private, protected, public, kike in javadoc?
Mar 18 2007