• Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d (9/9) Sep 23 2016 instead of having multiple binaries polluting global namespace what abou...
• rikki cattermole (4/13) Sep 23 2016 I'd suggest dlangtools instead.
• ketmar (4/5) Sep 23 2016 exactly the thing virtually nobody will type even with
• rikki cattermole (2/5) Sep 23 2016 Bingo! No reason for us to invite name conflicts.
• ketmar (4/11) Sep 23 2016 i bet someone already has dlangtools executable. i suggest

Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> writes:

instead of having multiple binaries polluting global namespace what about
combining them into:

dtools --catdoc
dtools --changed

etc

with maybe exception of a few such as rdmd

advantages:
less pollution of global namespace, smaller overall size (binaries
duplicate code), more opportunities for refactoring

rikki cattermole <rikki cattermole.co.nz> writes:

On 24/09/2016 9:47 AM, Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d wrote:
 instead of having multiple binaries polluting global namespace what
 about combining them into:

 dtools --catdoc
 dtools --changed

 etc

 with maybe exception of a few such as rdmd

 advantages:
 less pollution of global namespace, smaller overall size (binaries
 duplicate code), more opportunities for refactoring

I'd suggest dlangtools instead.
After all, dtools sounds like something that could be used by other 
projects.

ketmar <ketmar ketmar.no-ip.org> writes:

On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 04:54:51 UTC, rikki cattermole 
wrote:
 I'd suggest dlangtools instead.

exactly the thing virtually nobody will type even with 
autocompletion.

rikki cattermole <rikki cattermole.co.nz> writes:

On 24/09/2016 5:11 PM, ketmar wrote:
 On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 04:54:51 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
 I'd suggest dlangtools instead.

 exactly the thing virtually nobody will type even with autocompletion.

Bingo! No reason for us to invite name conflicts.

ketmar <ketmar ketmar.no-ip.org> writes:

On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 05:19:39 UTC, rikki cattermole 
wrote:
 On 24/09/2016 5:11 PM, ketmar wrote:
 On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 04:54:51 UTC, rikki 
 cattermole wrote:
 I'd suggest dlangtools instead.

 exactly the thing virtually nobody will type even with 
 autocompletion.

 Bingo! No reason for us to invite name conflicts.

i bet someone already has dlangtools executable. i suggest 
NaIswgm0Z7A3YmK.