www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - feature request: really verbose mode

reply BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:
I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and it turned 
out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in the dir I was working 
in. I was playing with settings so I expected something like this but the 
-v flag didn't give me anything useful. It would be nice to have the -v flag 
(or a -vv flag) given the full effective command line as gathered from all 
over the place and where the args come from.
Aug 30 2007
parent reply Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> writes:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:


 I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and it turned 
 out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in the dir I was working 
 in. I was playing with settings so I expected something like this but the 
 -v flag didn't give me anything useful. It would be nice to have the -v flag 
 (or a -vv flag) given the full effective command line as gathered from all 
 over the place and where the args come from.



BTW, 'Bud' does this with the -V switch.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell
Aug 30 2007
parent reply BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:
Reply to Derek,


 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:
 

 I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and it
 turned out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in the dir
 I was working in. I was playing with settings so I expected something
 like this but the -v flag didn't give me anything useful. It would be
 nice to have the -v flag (or a -vv flag) given the full effective
 command line as gathered from all over the place and where the args
 come from.
 



 



Just for BUD's args or does it figure out what DMD will be fed?
Aug 30 2007
parent reply Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> writes:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:14:18 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:


 Reply to Derek,
 

 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:
 

 I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and it
 turned out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in the dir
 I was working in. I was playing with settings so I expected something
 like this but the -v flag didn't give me anything useful. It would be
 nice to have the -v flag (or a -vv flag) given the full effective
 command line as gathered from all over the place and where the args
 come from.
 



 



 Just for BUD's args or does it figure out what DMD will be fed?



Everything. In fact, it might be a little too verbose for some people.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell
Aug 30 2007
parent BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:
Reply to Derek,


 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:14:18 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:
 

 Reply to Derek,
 

 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:
 

 I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and
 it turned out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in
 the dir I was working in. I was playing with settings so I expected
 something like this but the -v flag didn't give me anything useful.
 It would be nice to have the -v flag (or a -vv flag) given the full
 effective command line as gathered from all over the place and
 where the args come from.
 



 



 



 



I work with 400K trace logs for fun, their is no sutch thing as "a little 
too verbose". <G>
Aug 30 2007