www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 9879] New: Built-in sizeof should return ErrorExp if error occurs in aggregate type semantics

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9879

           Summary: Built-in sizeof should return ErrorExp if error occurs
                    in aggregate type semantics
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: k.hara.pg gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> 2013-04-04 21:12:54 PDT ---
From bug 4269:

With this code, `__traits` should return `false`, but doesn't.

static if (__traits(compiles,A.sizeof)) pragma(msg, "A.sizeof compiles!");
class A { void foo(B b); }

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 04 2013
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9879


Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |pull


--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> 2013-04-04 21:19:38 PDT ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1843

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 04 2013
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9879



--- Comment #2 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> 2013-04-05 03:58:02 PDT ---
This behaviour is intentional.

Although there is an error in a function declared in A, the size of A is still
known.

Just as an error inside a function definition doesn't make the type of the
function unknown.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 05 2013
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9879


Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> 2013-04-05 04:12:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 This behaviour is intentional.
 
 Although there is an error in a function declared in A, the size of A is still
 known.
 
 Just as an error inside a function definition doesn't make the type of the
 function unknown.
OK, It makes sense. Thanks. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 05 2013
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9879



--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> 2013-04-05 04:13:30 PDT ---
*** Issue 9856 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 05 2013