digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 9416] New: [REG][2.060 -> 02.061] DMD eagerly instantiates template parameter-less opAssign
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (64/64) Jan 28 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9416
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Jan 30 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9416
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Jan 31 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9416
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Jan 31 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9416
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9416 Summary: [REG][2.060 -> 02.061] DMD eagerly instantiates template parameter-less opAssign Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: monarchdodra gmail.com Regression from 2.060: No matter what, when given an template but parameter less opAssign that takes a typeof(this) (or a type explicitly castable to typeof(this)), dmd will try to instantiate it. Here is a clearer explanation in the form of a reduced test case. //---- struct S { void bar()(S) { static assert(0); //Fine } void opAssign()(int) { static assert(0); //Fine } void opAssign()(S) { static assert(0); //main.d(13): Error: static assert (0) is false //main.d(2): instantiated from here: opAssign!() } } void main() {} //---- Expected behavior should be: No error unless opAssign is called (It isn't). This is problematic for template structs that use this scheme for "poor man's SFINAE", or who template functions just so that the compiler can guess the correct "nothrowness" of said function. For example: std.typecons.Nullable: //---- import std.typecons; void main() { Nullable!(immutable int) s; } //---- 2.060: Fine 2.061: src\phobos\std\typecons.d(1170): Error: can only initialize const member _value inside constructor //Inside std.typecons.Nullable: void opAssign()(T value) { _value = value; //HERE _isNull = false; } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 28 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9416 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1585 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 30 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9416 Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/ca03c609211952f9640d38531dd4f282cedc22ac fix Issue 9416 - [REG][2.060 -> 02.061] DMD eagerly instantiates template parameter-less opAssign https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b94fd3b7d2164ef1fc924265d4c5d04c7c673463 Issue 9258 & 9404 & 9416 - fix regressions around opAssign -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 31 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9416 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 31 2013