www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 9019] New: invariant does not compile/run if class does not define constructor

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9019

           Summary: invariant does not compile/run if class does not
                    define constructor
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: wrong-code
          Severity: major
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: andrej.mitrovich gmail.com



16:34:53 PST ---
class C
{
    invariant()
    {
        assert(0);
    }
}

void main()
{
    C c = new C();  // should fail after ctor invoked
}

C has an implicitly generated constructor, but the invariant isn't compiled or
it doesn't run. If you add an explicit empty constructor then it does get
added.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 13 2012
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9019


Maxim Fomin <maxim maxim-fomin.ru> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |maxim maxim-fomin.ru



---


 C has an implicitly generated constructor


Why? It seems there is no constructor in case like this. 


 but the invariant isn't compiled or
 it doesn't run. If you add an explicit empty constructor then it does get
 added.


It is compiled but is not run because there is no ctor. The spec says that
invariant is called when ctor completes but it does not say what happens when
there is no ctor. You actually asking either create dummy ctor for cases like
this or call invariant just after allocating class object which is not
efficient - the first call to public function will abort the application
anyway.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 14 2012
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9019


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE



Duplicate of one of the oldest open bugs!

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 519 ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 15 2012
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9019




00:23:58 PST ---


 Duplicate of one of the oldest open bugs!


Good thing it's assigned to someone, that means it will be fixed soon! Probably
before new years eve 2006.

:P

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 15 2012