digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 8928] New: Poor error message for derived class without constructor
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (29/29) Nov 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Nov 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Nov 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/13) Nov 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/12) Nov 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/8) Nov 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Nov 29 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Dec 09 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Dec 27 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Summary: Poor error message for derived class without constructor Product: D Version: D1 & D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: clugdbug yahoo.com.au class X { this(int n) {} } class Y : X { } qef.d(5): Error: constructor qef.Y.this no match for implicit super() call in constructor ---- But Y doesn't have a constructor! Seems the compiler generates an implicit constructor, and then complains that it's erroneous. Actually I'm not sure why it doesn't generate this(int n) { super(n); }, but that's a different issue. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrej.mitrovich gmail.com 22:26:45 PDT --- How about: Error: synthesized constructor qef.Y.this no match for implicit super() call in constructor -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisProg gmx.com PDT --- "Synthesized?" That's a very odd choice of words, and actually, I'd argue that it's outright incorrect. How about something more like Error: Cannot generate default constructor for qef.Y, because its base class, qef.X, has no default constructor. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 22:48:02 PDT ---"Synthesized?" That's a very odd choice of words, and actually, I'd argue that it's outright incorrect.It's standard terminology, you can look up the C++ reference manual if you wish. Here's a sample g++ error when the compiler implicitly generates a method: /usr/include/c++/4.4/iosfwd:56: note: synthesized method ‘std::basic_ios >& std::basic_ios >::operator=(const std::basic_ios >&)’ first required here -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 22:48:53 PDT ---But I'm not saying it's the best choice of words. So suggestions are welcome. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------"Synthesized?" That's a very odd choice of words, and actually, I'd argue that it's outright incorrect.It's standard terminology
Nov 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 PDT --- Well, it really doesn't match the definition of synthesized at all, so I have to wonder about whoever picked it for C++. Regardless, using it in an error message like that isn't going to be clear to most programmers. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull AssignedTo|nobody puremagic.com |andrej.mitrovich gmail.com 14:42:53 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1336 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 29 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/6a4840212b1ee0611c9c8fecc59ec8500e8999ea Fixes Issue 8928 - Improve error message with implicitly generated constructor. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/4cc63a038e27356d5d60a93e57b794b37167cab0 [diag] Issue 8928 - Improve error message with implicitly generated constructor -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 09 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugzilla digitalmars.com Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 27 2012