www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 8878] New: std.range is not pure

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8878

           Summary: std.range is not pure
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Optlink
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: bioinfornatics gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from bioinfornatics <bioinfornatics gmail.com> 2012-10-23
05:27:40 PDT ---
Dear,

std.range should provide some pure function as;
iota -> 0 to to should give evey time the same result
zip  -> when it is an array (not an associative array) should be always the
same result

and other …

this missing feature allowed developers to use the pure in many case

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 23 2012
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8878


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |jmdavisProg gmx.com
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> 2012-10-23 11:22:28
PDT ---
pure is inferred for templated functions. As long as the functions for the
range used are pure, then the functions in std.range and std.algorithm will
generally be pure. There may be some compiler bugs which make it so that that
doesn't always work like it's supposed to, but pretty much zero functions in
std.range and std.algorithm should be marked as pure, since whether they can be
pure or not really depends on the types used with them, which is why attribute
inferrence for templates was introduced in the first place.

If you have an issue with a specific function with a specific type which does
have pure member functions and the templated function is not being inferred as
pure, then please report it with an appropriate code sample, but it would be
wrong to specifically provide pure versions of functions like iota or zip.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 23 2012
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8878



--- Comment #2 from bioinfornatics <bioinfornatics gmail.com> 2012-10-23
12:13:51 PDT ---
In first thanks jonathan to your answer.
Code below fail both when using pure with dmd/ldc  dmdfe 2.060 =>
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/65efd36e

___________________________________________
import std.range;
import std.stdio;

pure uint square( in int[] x, in int[] y ){
    uint result = 0;
    foreach( item; zip( x, y ) )
        result += item[0] * item[1];
    return result;
}

int main(){
    int[3] a = [0,1,2];
    int[3] b = [1,2,3];
    writefln( "Square of %s with %s give %u", a, b, square( a, b ) );
}

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 23 2012
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8878


bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bearophile_hugs eml.cc


--- Comment #3 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2012-10-23 14:13:32 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)

 If you have an issue with a specific function with a specific type which does
 have pure member functions and the templated function is not being inferred as
 pure, then please report it with an appropriate code sample, but it would be
 wrong to specifically provide pure versions of functions like iota or zip.
This gives: test.d(3): Error: pure function 'main' cannot call impure function 'iota' import std.range: iota; void main() pure { iota(10); } This gives: test.d(4): Error: pure function 'main' cannot call impure function 'map' test.d(4): Error: map is not nothrow test.d(2): Error: function D main 'main' is nothrow yet may throw import std.algorithm: map; void main() pure nothrow { int[] data = [1, 2, 3]; auto r = map!q{a * a}(data); } I propose to reopen this bug report, and change its meaning and title: instead of asking for such functions to be marked as pure, to ask them to be usable in a pure (and sometimes nothrow) situations. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 23 2012
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8878


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|Optlink                     |Phobos


--- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> 2012-10-23 15:25:37
PDT ---
It would probably be cleaner to just create a new bug report, but you can
reopen this one if you want to. Regardless, the bug as initially reported is
incorrect.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 23 2012
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8878


bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|Phobos                      |Optlink


--- Comment #5 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2012-10-23 16:44:32 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 It would probably be cleaner to just create a new bug report,
Thank you for the answer. I have opened Issue 8882 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 23 2012