digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 8661] New: typeof not an attribute, doesn't work with UFCS
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Sep 14 2012
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Sep 14 2012
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Sep 14 2012
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Sep 14 2012
- "ixid" <nuaccount gmail.com> Sep 14 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8661 Summary: typeof not an attribute, doesn't work with UFCS Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: monarchdodra gmail.com --- Comment #0 from monarchdodra gmail.com 2012-09-14 05:57:31 PDT --- In the title: Because "typeof" is a keyword,it does not have the same semantics as the other properties (http://dlang.org/property.html), such as stringof, sizeof etc.. For example: -------- void main() { int a; writeln(int.stringof); writeln(a.typeof.stringof); //This writeln(typeof(a).stringof); } -------- The syntax "a.typeof.stringof" should be made to work. UFCS should not have a different behavior because typeof is a keyword. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 14 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8661 Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisProg gmx.com --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> 2012-09-14 08:32:51 PDT --- typeof isn't a function, nor is it a property. It's a built-in construct like is-expressions are. Would you want is-expressions to work with UFCS as well? No, I think that this is trying to take UFCS too far. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 14 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8661 bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bearophile_hugs eml.cc --- Comment #2 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2012-09-14 09:54:18 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1)typeof isn't a function, nor is it a property. It's a built-in construct like is-expressions are. Would you want is-expressions to work with UFCS as well? No, I think that this is trying to take UFCS too far.
See my Issue 4272 I think "a.typeof" is a nice syntax to have, similar to "a.sizeof". But this isn't an example of UFCS. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 14 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8661 monarchdodra gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from monarchdodra gmail.com 2012-09-14 11:17:23 PDT --- Yeah... I should have opened it as ER, not Bug. You are right, "nice to have". I searched if it existed before, but did not find your issue. Closing as duplicate. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4272 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 14 2012
Why is this taking it too far? In the duplicate you also expressed reservations about it without explaining why it's a bad idea. UFCS seems very much like the natural evolution of D's syntax and once (if) that's accepted it should be as consistent and general as possible.
Sep 14 2012









d-bugmail puremagic.com 