www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 7064] New: .stringof of eponymous template

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7064

           Summary: .stringof of eponymous template
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: timon.gehr gmx.ch



struct S(T){int x;}

template X(T){
    struct S{int x;}
}

void main(){
    pragma(msg, S!int); // "struct S"
    pragma(msg, X!int); // X!(int)
    pragma(msg, X!int.S); // "S", why not identical to first one?
}

The fact that for eponymous templates the template parameters are not shown
sometimes has a severe negative impact on the readability of error messages, as
well as on the usefulness of debug output via pragma(msg)

I propose that .stringof for eponymous templates should apply to the template
instance instead of to the eponymous declaration.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 04 2011
parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7064


timon.gehr gmx.ch changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|.stringof of eponymous      |.stringof of eponymous
                   |template                    |struct/class/interface
                   |                            |template



But that should only be the case for templated types, for example the following
should still print "1":

template X(int x) {
    enum X = x;
}
pragma(msg, X!1);

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 04 2011