digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 676] New: These two funcs shouldn't conflict
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (25/25) Dec 11 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (15/15) Jan 01 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Jan 03 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (19/19) Apr 09 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/16) Jul 14 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Nov 26 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676 Summary: These two funcs shouldn't conflict Product: D Version: 0.177 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: davidl 126.com alias uint Handle; extern(C) { void function (Handle, byte, wchar*, uint) udat_applyPattern ; } void udat_applyPattern(Handle h, byte b, wchar[] wc, uint ui) { udat_applyPattern(h,b,cast(wchar*)wc,ui); } void main() { } --
Dec 11 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676 thomas-dloop kuehne.cn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement OS/Version|Windows |All These aren't 2 functions but a function and a pointer to function. To get the intended functionality replace void function (Handle, byte, wchar*, uint) udat_applyPattern ; with void udat_applyPattern (Handle, byte, wchar*, uint); I've changed the severity from "normal" to "enhancement" as the original issue is currently illegal D but also an interesting use case. --
Jan 01 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676 davidl 126.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |minor umm , shouldn't call it an enhancement. it's more important than an enhancement at least it's around minor level. and it breaks existing code --
Jan 03 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676 davidl 126.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|minor |normal simplified case: extern void function (char*) udat_applyPattern ; void udat_applyPattern(char[] wc) { udat_applyPattern(cast(char*)wc); } void main() { } i think it's about the completeness of the dmd function type calling system and the completeness of type matching system. so I remark it as normal level --
Apr 09 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676 Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |clugdbug yahoo.com.au Severity|normal |enhancement This is not a bug. There aren't two functions, just one function and a variable. Note that if this was allowed, you could reasonably expect a struct with static opCall to work, as well. And then you ask why _any_ type or variable cannot overload a function. Add properties into the mix -- it'd be a disaster. I think this bug should be closed as invalid. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 14 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=676 Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei metalanguage.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andrei metalanguage.com AssignedTo|nobody puremagic.com |bugzilla digitalmars.com 13:26:52 PST --- I'll leave the decision to Walter. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 26 2010