www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 4588] New: [lex] ttributes are not documented

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4588

           Summary: [lex]  ttributes are not documented
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: www.digitalmars.com
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: dfj1esp02 sneakemail.com


--- Comment #0 from Sobirari Muhomori <dfj1esp02 sneakemail.com> 2010-08-05
10:01:07 PDT ---
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/lex.html
  character is not listed as a token.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/attribute.html
Various attributes like  safe and  pure are not listed.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/function.html
Alternative syntax for pure and nothrow attributes is not documented.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/declaration.html
New function attributes like  safe and  trusted are not listed neither as
StorageClass nor as FunctionAttribute.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 05 2010
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4588


Bernard Helyer <blood.of.life gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |blood.of.life gmail.com


--- Comment #1 from Bernard Helyer <blood.of.life gmail.com> 2011-01-10
17:50:15 PST ---
It's not that there's an alternative syntax for pure and nothrow, it's that
(like immutable) they are both a storage class and attributes (the attribute
form merely imbuing scoped declarations with the corresponding storage class).
They should be listed in the attribute page, but aren't.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 10 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4588


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdavisProg gmx.com


--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> 2011-01-10 19:09:22
PST ---
I would expect  pure and  nothrow to be going away. It was decided to go with
pure and nothrow rather than  pure and  nothrow, so I don't see why the  
versions would be sticking around. We ended up with both, because it was
debated as to what should use   and what should be a keyword.

 safe,  trusted, and  system are all valid, as is  property. However, I can't
think of any others at the moment which are actually currently supposed to have
  on the front.

And as for   being a token, I'm not sure that it _is_ a token. I'd have to look
at the lexer code to verify one way or another. Given the way that   is used, I
think that there's a decent chance that  safe,  trusted,  system, and  property
are all considered tokens and   isn't. I would like it to be though, since it
would be necessary if we're ever going to get user-defined attributes.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 10 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4588


Ellery Newcomer <ellery-newcomer utulsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ellery-newcomer utulsa.edu


--- Comment #3 from Ellery Newcomer <ellery-newcomer utulsa.edu> 2011-01-22
13:06:41 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/lex.html
   character is not listed as a token.
 
It is listed as a token now -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 22 2011
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4588


Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |bugzilla digitalmars.com
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME


--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> 2012-01-23
21:39:40 PST ---
These are all taken care of.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 23 2012