www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 3808] New: Assertion Failure : Assertion failure: 'classinfo->structsize == CLASSINFO_SIZE' on line 870 in file 'toobj.c'

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3808

           Summary: Assertion Failure : Assertion failure:
                    'classinfo->structsize == CLASSINFO_SIZE' on line 870
                    in file  'toobj.c'
           Product: D
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: x86
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: blocker
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: petitv.isat gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from Petit Vincent <petitv.isat gmail.com> 2010-02-16 14:23:36
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=568)
sc.ini, makefile, binding, screen

Well, I found this bug when I was trying to make the win32lib from the binding
available on Dsource.org.

I'll try to explain the environment with lot of details :

1. DMD Compiler : Version 1.033, 1.056 ; 2.040, dmd2beta have been "tested".
Each one returned the bug. So, the version of the compiler don't play a role to
have this bug.

2. Libraries :

- Standard Library : tango 0.98 and tango 0.99.9 kai have been tried too. Same
result.

- Others : tried with and without these ones : tangobos (latest), DFL (latest),
INI (from dprogramming.com). Nothing changed the result.

3. Binding :

- Win32 from DSource - the latest one from trunk version (trunk-r337)


4. Attachement :

- The makefile for the binding (and the binding itself)
- A screen from my dmd\lib directory
- sc.ini file I'm using (there's lot of comments cause of tests I made for this
bug or other things ...)

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 16 2010
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3808



--- Comment #1 from Petit Vincent <petitv.isat gmail.com> 2010-02-16 14:25:18
PST ---
Well, I found this bug when I was trying to make the win32lib from the binding
available on Dsource.org.

I'll try to explain the environment with lot of details :

1. DMD Compiler : Version 1.033, 1.056 ; 2.040, dmd2beta have been "tested".
Each one returned the bug. So, the version of the compiler don't play a role to
have this bug.

2. Libraries :

- Standard Library : tango 0.98 and tango 0.99.9 kai have been tried too. Same
result.

- Others : tried with and without these ones : tangobos (latest), DFL (latest),
INI (from dprogramming.com). Nothing changed the result.

3. Binding :

- Win32 from DSource - the latest one from trunk version (trunk-r337)


4. Attachement :

- The makefile for the binding (and the binding itself)
- A screen from my dmd\lib directory
- sc.ini file I'm using (there's lot of comments cause of tests I made for this
bug or other things ...)

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 16 2010
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3808


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-invalid-code
                 CC|                            |clugdbug yahoo.com.au


--- Comment #2 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> 2010-03-11 08:18:50 PST ---
This is caused by an incorrectly installed DMD (wrong phobos.lib). However, the
compiler should say that, instead of failing with an assert).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 11 2010
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3808


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch


--- Comment #3 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> 2010-03-15 14:02:16 PDT ---
The error message should be improved. I suggest something like this:

toobj, line 995:

    if (vtblInterfaces->dim)
    {
-      if (classinfo)
-        assert(classinfo->structsize == CLASSINFO_SIZE);
+        if (classinfo && classinfo->structsize != CLASSINFO_SIZE)
+        error("Incorrect installation. D compiler and phobos' typeinfo are
mismatched");
    offset = CLASSINFO_SIZE;
    dtxoff(&dt, csym, offset, TYnptr);    // (*)

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 15 2010
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3808


Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugzilla digitalmars.com


--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> 2010-03-28
14:13:34 PDT ---
changeset 425

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 28 2010
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3808


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


--- Comment #5 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> 2010-04-09 13:41:54 PDT ---
Fixed DMD1.058 and 2.043.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 09 2010