digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 3798] New: core.cpuid locks systems with Xeon E5530 CPU
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (49/49) Feb 12 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (33/33) Feb 12 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (15/36) Feb 12 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/12) Feb 13 2010 Yep, that fixes it. Please fold into druntime for the next release.
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/15) Feb 13 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Mar 10 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798 Summary: core.cpuid locks systems with Xeon E5530 CPU Product: D Version: 2.040 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: dsimcha yahoo.com At my workplace, we've got a bunch of Linux boxes around. On the ones with the following cpuinfo, importing core.cpuid causes any D program to hang with 100% CPU usage during execution of static this() before main() is even called: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 26 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5530 2.40GHz stepping : 5 cpu MHz : 2393.863 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 1 siblings : 8 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 16 initial apicid : 16 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 11 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology tsc_reliable nonstop_tsc pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid bogomips : 4787.72 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: According to GDB, the function where the program hangs is core.cpuid.getCpuInfo0B(). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 12 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798 ASsa temporary workaround, I'm using: if (0) { //max_cpuid >=0x0B) { // For Intel i7 and later, use function 0x0B to determine // cores and hyperthreads. getCpuInfo0B(); } else { if (hyperThreadingBit) maxThreads = (apic>>>16) & 0xFF; else maxThreads = maxCores; } The problem appears to be that the termination condition for the following loop never becomes true: do { asm { mov EAX, 0x0B; mov ECX, level; cpuid; mov a, EAX; mov b, EAX; mov c, ECX; mov d, EDX; } if (b!=0) { // I'm not sure about this. The docs state that there // are 2 hyperthreads per core if HT is factory enabled. if (level==0) maxThreads = b & 0xFFFF; else if (level==1) maxCores = b & 0xFFFF; } } while (a!=0 || b!=0); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 12 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798 Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |clugdbug yahoo.com.auThe problem appears to be that the termination condition for the following loop never becomes true: do { asm { mov EAX, 0x0B; mov ECX, level; cpuid; mov a, EAX; mov b, EAX; mov c, ECX; mov d, EDX; } if (b!=0) { // I'm not sure about this. The docs state that there // are 2 hyperthreads per core if HT is factory enabled. if (level==0) maxThreads = b & 0xFFFF; else if (level==1) maxCores = b & 0xFFFF; } } while (a!=0 || b!=0);Please add ++level; as the last line of that loop, so that it ends as: ++level; } while (a!=0 || b!=0); Does that fix it? I don't have access to a Core i7, so I'm flying blind based on the Intel manuals. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 12 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798Please add ++level; as the last line of that loop, so that it ends as: ++level; } while (a!=0 || b!=0); Does that fix it? I don't have access to a Core i7, so I'm flying blind based on the Intel manuals.Yep, that fixes it. Please fold into druntime for the next release. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 13 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798Excellent! Druntime svn 245. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------Please add ++level; as the last line of that loop, so that it ends as: ++level; } while (a!=0 || b!=0); Does that fix it? I don't have access to a Core i7, so I'm flying blind based on the Intel manuals.Yep, that fixes it. Please fold into druntime for the next release.
Feb 13 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3798 Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Fixed DMD2.041. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 10 2010