digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 3728] New: getOverloads and identifier traits
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 20 2010
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 20 2010
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 20 2010
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 20 2010
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 20 2010
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 20 2010
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 22 2010
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 22 2010
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 22 2010
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Jan 30 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 Summary: getOverloads and identifier traits Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: samukha voliacable.com --- Comment #0 from Max Samukha <samukha voliacable.com> 2010-01-20 09:06:49 PST --- For QtD, we need to get overloads of any function at compile time, not only virtuals. Currently we are using a seemingly working dmd modified with the patch attached. The patch also adds an 'identifier' trait, which allows to get symbol identifiers without parsing the value of stringof. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 20 2010
d-bugmail puremagic.com http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 --- Comment #1 from Max Samukha <samukha voliacable.com> 2010-01-20 09:09:47 PST --- Created an attachment (id=553) getOverloads, identifier traits -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 20 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 Max Samukha <samukha voliacable.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|critical |enhancement -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 20 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei metalanguage.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrei metalanguage.com Severity|enhancement |critical --- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei metalanguage.com> 2010-01-20 09:39:09 PST --- Given the size and visibility of Qt, I think it's fair to leave this as critical. I also voted for it :o). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 20 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 Eldar Insafutdinov <e.insafutdinov gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |e.insafutdinov gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Eldar Insafutdinov <e.insafutdinov gmail.com> 2010-01-20 10:08:35 PST --- (In reply to comment #2)Given the size and visibility of Qt, I think it's fair to leave this as critical. I also voted for it :o).
Yeah, it actually is a blocker as you cannot use unpatched dmd for qtd. Thanks for voting. In fact this functionality was requested in the bug report 2855. The reason why we replace getVirtualFunctions with getOverloads rather than add the new one is because the functionality that the former provides could easily be achieved by filtering out the ouput of the latter with isVirtualFunction trait. That way we don't bloat __traits. The mentioned patch also provides isStaticFunction trait which we will eventually need. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 20 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 --- Comment #4 from Max Samukha <samukha voliacable.com> 2010-01-20 11:07:36 PST --- When implementing isStaticFunction, please make sure it returns true for any function that doesn't require a context pointer (even if there is no explicit STCstatic). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 20 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla digitalmars.com --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> 2010-01-22 02:37:22 PST --- Changeset 346 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 22 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 --- Comment #6 from Eldar Insafutdinov <e.insafutdinov gmail.com> 2010-01-22 03:46:00 PST --- (In reply to comment #5)Changeset 346
Thanks for applying the patch. Although there is a minor issue when building dmd on linux with gcc: traits.c:57: error: could not convert ‘f->FuncDeclaration::isVirtual’ to ‘bool’ traits.c:57: error: in argument to unary ! The fix is trivial, to add brackets to method call: f->isVirtual(). I didn't know that dmc can compile function calls without brackets. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 22 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 --- Comment #7 from Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> 2010-01-22 20:25:36 PST --- Added the (), changeset 347 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 22 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> 2010-01-30 22:47:42 PST --- fixed dmd 2.040 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 30 2010