digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 3214] New: Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on Linux
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (55/55) Jul 29 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (33/33) Jul 29 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Sep 08 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Nov 21 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Nov 22 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Apr 01 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Jan 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Jan 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Apr 04 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
Summary: Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on
Linux
Product: D
Version: 1.046
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
ReportedBy: nfxjfg gmail.com
Here's an example that shows that dmd obviously/probably generates incorrect
DWARF line number debugging information under Linux. The example consists of
several modules, and I don't know if it's further reducible, or where the
problem actually is. (I'm happy that's it's reproducible at all.)
a.d >>>
module a;
import b;
void main(char[][] args) {
throw new Exception("huh");
}
<<<
b.d >>>
module b;
import c;
void foo1() {
}
<<<
c.d >>>
module c;
class Foo2 : Exception {
this() {
super("huh");
}
}
<<<
Compile exactly like this:
dmd -c a.d b.d c.d -od. -g
dmd a.o b.o c.o -ofa -g
Now look what is wrong and check if the symbol "_D1c4Foo25_ctorMFZC1c4Foo2" is
correct:
1. Get address:
nm a|grep _D1c4Foo25_ctorMFZC1c4Foo2 |cut -f2 -d: | cut -f1 -d' '
(outputs something like "08049b64")
2. Resolve the address:
addr2line -e a 0x08049b64
This outputs "/tmp/test/xx/b.d:5", although the symbol is in c.d. Somehow, the
address is incorrectly resolved, which suggests that the compiler might
generate incorrect debugging information.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 29 2009
d-bugmail puremagic.com http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 Created an attachment (id=435) --> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=435) dmd patch to fix the problem (against dmd 1.046) I think I found out why it doesn't work: when compiling several files at once, the object writer's state isn't reset correctly. Now I don't know how the hell the backend works; I just noticed that the DWARF writer still tried to write line numbers from the previous file (also notice what's added by objlinnum()). In this case, c.o contained some line number information from b.o, which is why addr2line resolved the address mentioned to b.d. I'm posting a trivial 3 line patch that seems to solve the problem. It simply makes obj_init() forget about the SegData from the previous object file. I don't know if it's correct or complete, but with my test cases (the one posted above and a larger, non-trivial heap of code) it seemed to work very well. The patch causes a little memory leak, but that'd trivial to fix (maybe not setting seg_max to 0 does it). There's just one more problem. When resolving some invalid address with addr2line, I get this output: BFD: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number). BFD: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number). BFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 1014. BFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 119. BFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 651. BFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 53. BFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 84. BFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 657. BFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 1230. I have no idea what's up with that and I can't reproduce it with a simpler testcase. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 29 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
Robert Clipsham <robert octarineparrot.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
CC| |robert octarineparrot.com
05:49:22 PDT ---
Don't forget to add the patch keyword along with the patch so it doesn't get
missed :)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 08 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
nfxjfg gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |3540
Also see 3540.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 21 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 Problem still persists in dmd 1.051 and the dmd svn version (as of revision 267). I assume there is some other problem, that doesn't make fixing the bug as simple as it seems? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 22 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 It's strange... With my patch, my executable has a size of 16 MB, with a .debug_line section size of ca. 500 KB. Without my patch, it's 32 MB, of which .debug_line takes up 16 MB. PS: With the fix for bug 3987, the addr2line error messages go away (when compiling with -gc). Which means my patch doesn't cause additional problems at least in this aspect. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 01 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
nfxjfg gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 06 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |braddr puremagic.com
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 06 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
CC| |bugzilla digitalmars.com
Resolution| |FIXED
12:36:33 PDT ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/01aab6459cfba2eb85feb1481c01c17b8a3badfe
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/5f1a6afb1363fe950d2392748fc35f5914c6c6f5
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 04 2011