|
Archives
D Programming
digitalmars.Ddigitalmars.D.bugs digitalmars.D.dtl digitalmars.D.ide digitalmars.D.dwt digitalmars.D.announce digitalmars.D.learn digitalmars.D.debugger D.gnu D C/C++ Programming
c++c++.announce c++.atl c++.beta c++.chat c++.command-line c++.dos c++.dos.16-bits c++.dos.32-bits c++.idde c++.mfc c++.rtl c++.stl c++.stl.hp c++.stl.port c++.stl.sgi c++.stlsoft c++.windows c++.windows.16-bits c++.windows.32-bits c++.wxwindows digitalmars.empire digitalmars.DMDScript electronics |
digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 3065] New: error: this for variable needs to be Type not Type!(arguments).Type
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3065 Summary: error: this for variable needs to be Type not Type!(arguments).Type Product: D Version: 1.045 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: dhasenan gmail.com This message is vague because it does not include any template parameters the type may have. It is especially galling because the arguments are included in the second part and not the first. One fix is expression.c:270, check if ad->type is null. If it is, use the current code. Otherwise, use ad->type->toChars rather that ad->toChars. The other fix is to have AggregateDeclaration::toChars return type->toChars if type is not null. Since the latter is more general, I favor it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- Jun 11 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3065 --- Comment #1 from Chris Wright <dhasenan gmail.com> 2009-06-11 16:35:33 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=399) --> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=399) implements the more general fix described -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- Jun 11 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3065 --- Comment #2 from Chris Wright <dhasenan gmail.com> 2009-06-12 17:27:05 PDT --- Additionally, the fix I've found for this error is to access fields as: (cast(typeof(this)this).field or this.tupleof[INDEX] rather than the more typical: this.field My initial guess is that semantic is not being run on the relevant AggregateDeclaration. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- Jun 12 2009
|