digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 2396] New: -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop of large array of structs
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Oct 06 2008
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Oct 06 2008
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Oct 06 2008
- d-bugmail puremagic.com Oct 07 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2396 Summary: -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop of large array of structs Product: D Version: 2.019 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: schveiguy yahoo.com While porting Tango to D2, I've found the attached file (modified to compile under phobos) doesn't finish compiling in a reasonable amount of time (a.k.a never). The data table is from the Tango locale package, I stripped out the struct only so there isn't any real tango code, just data. If I compile the file without -O it compiles in 6 seconds, which seems reasonable since it's 600k of data. If you comment out most of the lines in the table, it compiles quickly. As you add lines back in, the runtime seems to grow exponentially (not scientifically verified). This file compiles fine with -O under dmd 1.x, Here's a list of dmd2 compilers that I had on my system to try out: 2.015, 2.016, 2.018: also fails 2.006, 2.007: works Note that in 2.006 and 2.007, it compiled much quicker with -O (.3 seconds) than without -O using the compilers that fail (6 seconds) --
Oct 06 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2396 ------- Comment #1 from schveiguy yahoo.com 2008-10-06 14:31 ------- Created an attachment (id=275) --> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=275&action=view) file to demonstrate bug --
Oct 06 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2396 ------- Comment #2 from schveiguy yahoo.com 2008-10-06 16:15 ------- BTW, this isn't exactly a blocker for Tango/D2, but in order to get it to work, I have to hand-compile the file, as the build-script uses -O for all Tango files. --
Oct 06 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2396 ------- Comment #3 from bugzilla digitalmars.com 2008-10-07 03:23 ------- Pulling out part of the loop body as a separate function or nested function should work as a workaround. --
Oct 07 2008









d-bugmail puremagic.com 