digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 2195] New: Variable shadowing is not detected and reported
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (23/23) Jul 05 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Aug 19 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Aug 19 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/13) Aug 31 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/13) Aug 31 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/17) Aug 31 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Jan 29 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (22/22) Aug 24 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/13) Oct 28 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195 Summary: Variable shadowing is not detected and reported Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: 2korden gmail.com Test case that fails as of 1.026 (earlist one I have) as well as latest one (1.031 atm). void main() { int[int] arr; int variable; foreach (i, j; arr) { int variable; // shadowing is disallowed but not detected } } --
Jul 05 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195 Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |smjg iname.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 47 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 19 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195 Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Version|1.00 |D1 & D2 Resolution|DUPLICATE | Severity|normal |regression I was wrong, the bug has come back (1.063 and 2.048, Windows). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 19 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195 Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|regression |normalI was wrong, the bug has come back (1.063 and 2.048, Windows).I tested 0.165, 1.000, 1.020, 1.032, 1.041, 1.050, 1.060 and a few others. This is not a regression. The bug was never gone. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 31 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195In that case, any clue why bug 47 was logged as fixed in 0.161, both on the bug page and in the changelog? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------I was wrong, the bug has come back (1.063 and 2.048, Windows).I tested 0.165, 1.000, 1.020, 1.032, 1.041, 1.050, 1.060 and a few others. This is not a regression. The bug was never gone.
Aug 31 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195Bug 47 was fixed, and still is. This isn't a duplicate. It applies only with foreach(). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------In that case, any clue why bug 47 was logged as fixed in 0.161, both on the bug page and in the changelog?I was wrong, the bug has come back (1.063 and 2.048, Windows).I tested 0.165, 1.000, 1.020, 1.032, 1.041, 1.050, 1.060 and a few others. This is not a regression. The bug was never gone.
Aug 31 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195 yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yebblies gmail.com Platform|x86 |All OS/Version|Windows |All Related to issue 2192. This only applies when foreach turns the body into a delegate. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 29 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195 Michal Minich <michal.minich gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michal.minich gmail.com PDT --- DMD 2.060 Similar case, where the variable is declared as foreach type list identifier module main; int global; int main (string[] args) { // int global = 10; // Error: shadowing declaration main.main.global // is deprecate .. ok foreach (global, item; [1, 2, 3]) // no error reported here for global .. // but expected {} writeln(global); // prints 0 } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 24 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2195DMD 2.060 Similar case, where the variable is declared as foreach type list identifier [snip]This case is not a bug/not this bug, local variables are allowed to shadow globals. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 28 2012