www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 11832] New: std.datetime: ddoc warnings

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11832

           Summary: std.datetime: ddoc warnings
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: andrei erdani.com


--- Comment #0 from Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei erdani.com> 2013-12-27 14:46:42
PST ---
std/datetime.d(1726): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'minutes'
std/datetime.d(2111): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter 'tz'
std/datetime.d(8468): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'isoString'
std/datetime.d(10563): Warning: Ddoc: parameter count mismatch
std/datetime.d(11227): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'value'
std/datetime.d(14626): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'isoString'
std/datetime.d(16114): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'value'
std/datetime.d(17850): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'isoString'
std/datetime.d(19467): Warning: Ddoc: parameter count mismatch
std/datetime.d(22107): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'dir'
std/datetime.d(22107): Warning: Ddoc: parameter count mismatch
std/datetime.d(23535): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'begin'
std/datetime.d(24369): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'dir'
std/datetime.d(24369): Warning: Ddoc: parameter count mismatch
std/datetime.d(29606): Warning: Ddoc: parameter count mismatch
std/datetime.d(31455): Warning: Ddoc: function declaration has no parameter
'sysTime'

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 27 2013
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11832



--- Comment #1 from Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei erdani.com> 2013-12-27 14:47:15
PST ---
these warnings are produced with make -f posix.mak html for phobos

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 27 2013
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11832


9999 <mailnew4ster gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mailnew4ster gmail.com


--- Comment #2 from 9999 <mailnew4ster gmail.com> 2013-12-27 14:57:33 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1536#discussion_r6103643

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 27 2013
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11832


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdavisProg gmx.com


--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> 2013-12-27 16:27:23
PST ---
 9999

Yes, any changes to std.datetime will cause me more merge problems in finishing
splitting std.datetime, but if any changes actually need to get in (e.g. a bug
fix), then they should be merged (and then I'll just have to deal with the
merge conflicts), particularly since I've been swamped at work for the past few
months and unable to finish splitting std.datetime (I'm in the middle of
reworking the documentation at this point). Right now, I'm expecting to get
back to D stuff towards the beginning of February, but I'm effectively a road
block until then with regards to any std.datetime changes which rely on me, and
while I'd prefer that more changes not be made to std.datetime in the interim
and cause me more work, if they need to be done, they need to be done. But I
would appreciate it if trivial stuff didn't get changed as it will create more
work for me.

I'll make sure that all such warnings are fixed as I rework the documentation,
but if anyone feels like they need to be fixed before that, then they can
create a pull request for it.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 27 2013