www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 10111] New: getProtection trait should work with inaccessible fields

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10111

           Summary: getProtection trait should work with inaccessible
                    fields
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: rejects-valid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: andrej.mitrovich gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> 2013-05-17
17:30:56 PDT ---
-----
module foo;

struct S
{
    private void m() { }
}
-----

-----
module test;

import foo;

void main()
{
    static if (__traits(getProtection, S.m != "private"))
    {
        // field might be accessible
    }
}
-----

$ dmd test.d
 test.d(7): Error: struct foo.S member m is not accessible
There's not much point in having this trait if it fails to compile due to accessibility problems. The trait has only one purpose and it's to return a string representation of a symbol's protection. There's nothing damaging about allowing it access to all fields, so I think the above should work. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 17 2013
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10111


Igor Stepanov <wazar.leollone yahoo.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wazar.leollone yahoo.com


--- Comment #1 from Igor Stepanov <wazar.leollone yahoo.com> 2013-05-17
17:35:58 PDT ---
is this bug is regression?
You was created an another issue:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9546
In #9546 same tests was passed.

static assert(__traits(getProtection, s.privA) == "private");
static assert(__traits(getProtection, s.protA) == "protected");
static assert(__traits(getProtection, s.packA) == "package");
-- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 17 2013
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10111


Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> 2013-05-17
17:42:10 PDT ---
God what a silly typo:

static if (__traits(getProtection, S.m != "private"))

The parenthesis is wrong, it should be:

static if (__traits(getProtection, S.m) != "private")

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 17 2013