digitalmars.D.bugs - [Bug 128] New: DMD crash with static if and anonymous classes
- d-bugmail puremagic.com May 05 2006
- d-bugmail puremagic.com May 18 2006
- d-bugmail puremagic.com May 18 2006
- d-bugmail puremagic.com May 18 2006
- d-bugmail puremagic.com May 19 2006
- Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.cn> May 24 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128 Summary: DMD crash with static if and anonymous classes Product: D Version: 0.156 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: h3r3tic mat.uni.torun.pl The following code causes DMD to crash without printing anything: class Foo {} static if (is(typeof(new class Foo{}))) {} Also, if I'm reading it correctly, the spec says that creating an instance of an anonymous class derived from Foo should look like "new class : Foo {}", while DMD prefers the "new class Foo {}" syntax. Is that a compiler or documentation bug ? --
May 05 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128 smjg iname.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smjg iname.com Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code ------- Comment #1 from smjg iname.com 2006-05-18 09:37 ------- Compiler crashing is always a bug. --
May 18 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128 ------- Comment #2 from h3r3tic mat.uni.torun.pl 2006-05-18 13:37 ------- (In reply to comment #1)Compiler crashing is always a bug.
Sure.. but my question wasn't about the crash. I asked "Is that a compiler or documentation bug ?" about the documentation/compiler mismatch. At the time of my original posting the doc said that a definition of an anonymous class contains BaseClassList_opt, which is defined to include the ':' token. In other words, the doc said DMD accepts: new class Foo : Bar{} while it wants: new class Foo Bar {} The documentation has been changed now, but it sill contains a minor bug: new ()ArgumentListopt class ()ArgumentListopt SuperClassopt InterfaceClassesopt ClassBody IMHO should be: new (ArgumentListopt) class (ArgumentListopt) SuperClassopt InterfaceClassesopt ClassBody /Tom --
May 18 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128 unknown simplemachines.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |unknown simplemachines.org ------- Comment #3 from unknown simplemachines.org 2006-05-18 15:42 ------- (In reply to comment #2)The documentation has been changed now, but it sill contains a minor bug: new ()ArgumentListopt class ()ArgumentListopt SuperClassopt InterfaceClassesopt ClassBody IMHO should be: new (ArgumentListopt) class (ArgumentListopt) SuperClassopt InterfaceClassesopt ClassBody
Actually, that's done throughout the documentation. I think it a bit strange, but it makes an amount of sense too. If that should be changed, it would have to be changed _everywhere_. And since I seem to remember it being the way you suggest, I can only guess it was changed on purpose. Anyway, I bet using the : makes parsing ternaries fun, which is probably why it doesn't use it. -[Unknown] --
May 18 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128 ------- Comment #4 from smjg iname.com 2006-05-19 15:26 ------- Something went askew while updating the documentation. Line breaks have also emerged in weird places. Not to mention numerous spelling mistakes.... --
May 19 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 d-bugmail puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-05-05:The following code causes DMD to crash without printing anything: class Foo {} static if (is(typeof(new class Foo{}))) {}
Added to DStress as http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/c/class_24_A.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/c/class_24_B.d Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFEdE6u3w+/yD4P9tIRAmkOAJ0Z0XpVF93SykaDIQcir0o/Fns2yQCfXtlC NtgsC3NMSO48P6EOmrf+4ww= =2g10 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
May 24 2006









d-bugmail puremagic.com 