www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - I see the DStress results have been updated for the first time in

reply Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:
Though we still haven't had a regression report posted here since 0.123.

Success rate up and down again from 86.7% through 88.0%, 87.8% and 87.7% 
to 87.9%.
Stability rate up from 98.1% through 98.6%, 98.5% and 97.9% to 98.8%.

http://smjg.port5.com/pr/d/dstress.xls
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html

While we're talking about DStress....

Why are abstract_01 to 04 nocompile?  Nothing in the spec (that I can 
find) indicates that abstract methods shouldn't be allowed to have 
contracts.  And the fact that contracts are supposed to be inherited 
would imply that they might be allowed.  Really, these four should be 
filed as undefined.

For that matter, what happened to the undefined testcases that were put 
in the other day?  The word 'undefined' is completely absent from the 
results page.

Another one that should be undefined is array_initialization_02, along 
with 17_A to C (maybe others in that area).  Because the spec 
contradicts itself on whether this is valid.

http://www.wikiservice.at/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?DocComments/Arrays#Contradiction

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Jun 22 2005
parent Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.this-is-spam.cn> writes:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stewart Gordon schrieb am Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:09:34 +0100:
 Though we still haven't had a regression report posted here since 0.123.

I'm simply to busy right now. GDC 0.12-0.14 and about 80 bug reports are still missing :(
 Why are abstract_01 to 04 nocompile?  Nothing in the spec (that I can 
 find) indicates that abstract methods shouldn't be allowed to have 
 contracts.  And the fact that contracts are supposed to be inherited 
 would imply that they might be allowed.  Really, these four should be 
 filed as undefined.

 For that matter, what happened to the undefined testcases that were put 
 in the other day?  The word 'undefined' is completely absent from the 
 results page.

 Another one that should be undefined is array_initialization_02, along 
 with 17_A to C (maybe others in that area).  Because the spec 
 contradicts itself on whether this is valid.

I'll have a look. Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCujWk3w+/yD4P9tIRAmf4AKCXg6xwnuHTRvAjenFoTp9lJvqfDgCghoBI CJvYuDYgHlfpQS7EVFVuDvk= =/gp6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Jun 22 2005