www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - DMD-0.121 regressions

reply Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> writes:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

XFAIL -> ERROR
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/class_07.d

PASS -> ERROR
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/typeid_13.d

Open issues:
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html

Complete results: (~1.4 MB)
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCY1WE3w+/yD4P9tIRAoR3AKCRa6nIwgSORweCx0iHOuHEzYW9nACgrz8m
Ql3EwR1UVEN4fcwhw676aAg=
=oW1W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apr 17 2005
next sibling parent reply Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> writes:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:36:53 +0200, Thomas Kuehne wrote:

 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1
 
 XFAIL -> ERROR
 http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/class_07.d
 
 PASS -> ERROR
 http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/typeid_13.d
 
 Open issues:
 http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html
 
 Complete results: (~1.4 MB)
 http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html
 
 Thomas
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iD8DBQFCY1WE3w+/yD4P9tIRAoR3AKCRa6nIwgSORweCx0iHOuHEzYW9nACgrz8m
 Ql3EwR1UVEN4fcwhw676aAg=
 =oW1W
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I've update the graphs at http://www.users.bigpond.com/ddparnell/dstress_results.html The salient points are : ** 89.7% pass rate (from 84.0%) ** Good to Bad ratio is now 8.74 (from 5.24). That is, for each failure there are 8.74 successes. ** We had 76 more expected passes. ** We had 21 more expected failures. ** We had 7 fewer unexpected passes. ** We had 74 fewer unexpected failures. ** We had 16 fewer compiler crashes. -- Derek Melbourne, Australia 18/04/2005 5:05:18 PM
Apr 18 2005
parent =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M=2E_M=FCnch?= <robert.muench robertmuench.de> writes:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:20:46 +0200, Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward>  
wrote:

 The salient points are :

 ** 89.7% pass rate (from 84.0%)

 ** Good to Bad ratio is now 8.74 (from 5.24). That is, for each  
 failure there are 8.74 successes.

 ** We had 76 more expected passes.
 ** We had 21 more expected failures.

 ** We had 7 fewer unexpected passes.
 ** We had 74 fewer unexpected failures.
 ** We had 16 fewer compiler crashes.

Thanks for this management summary, that's the info I like :-)) -- Robert M. Münch Management & IT Freelancer http://www.robertmuench.de
Apr 21 2005
prev sibling parent reply Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:
Thomas Kuehne wrote:
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1
 
 XFAIL -> ERROR
 http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/class_07.d
 
 PASS -> ERROR
 http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/typeid_13.d
 
 Open issues:
 http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html
 
 Complete results: (~1.4 MB)
 http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html
 
 Thomas

Success rate up from 84.0% to 89.7% (we're nearly at the 90% mark, but will we be for long?) Stability rate up from 98.5% to 99.5% (crossed the 99% mark, that must be a milestone!) http://smjg.port5.com/pr/d/dstress.xls BTW I noticed these: 1. Are you sure abstract_08 should error at line 20? It's either this or line 15. The spec doesn't clarify if abstract with a body should be allowed, or what it should mean if it is. 2. You've used the name destructor_04 twice, one in run and one in norun. Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Apr 19 2005
parent Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> writes:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stewart Gordon schrieb am Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:06:23 +0100:
 BTW I noticed these:

 1. Are you sure abstract_08 should error at line 20?  It's either this 
 or line 15.  The spec doesn't clarify if abstract with a body should be 
 allowed, or what it should mean if it is.

Split into abstract_08 and 13.
 2. You've used the name destructor_04 twice, one in run and one in norun.

Thanks, fixed Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCZO493w+/yD4P9tIRAkuRAJ0UgBCm7akpVCTTZsCFu+yTnOzyrwCgkIjb Y6JUHvpRFT3Odgv1jfQOZ2E= =raW9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apr 19 2005