• k2 <k2_member pathlink.com> Aug 04 2004
• Arcane Jill <Arcane_member pathlink.com> Aug 04 2004
• Nick <Nick_member pathlink.com> Aug 04 2004
• Juanjo =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=C1lvarez?= <juanjuxNO SPAMyahoo.es> Aug 04 2004
• Nick <Nick_member pathlink.com> Aug 05 2004

k2 <k2_member pathlink.com> writes:

DMD 0.97: crash with struct sorting

This code causes DMD 0.97 to segfault:

struct Foo {

int opCmp(Foo f)
{
return 0;
}
}

int main(char[][] args)
{
Foo[] foo;

foo.sort;

return 0;
}

---
w2000 DMD 0.97

Arcane Jill <Arcane_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <ceq9g7$25mj$1 digitaldaemon.com>, k2 says...
DMD 0.97: crash with struct sorting

This code causes DMD 0.97 to segfault:

struct Foo {

int opCmp(Foo f)
{
return 0;
}
}

int main(char[][] args)
{
Foo[] foo;

foo.sort;

return 0;
}

---
w2000 DMD 0.97



Presumably Foo.sizeof is zero, which I imagine would cause problems for sort?

Jill

Nick <Nick_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <cerbqk$cus$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Arcane Jill says...
Presumably Foo.sizeof is zero, which I imagine would cause problems for sort?

Jill


It's the compiler that crashes, not the program. (A simple test also comfirms
that .sort doesn't mind empty arrays.)

Nick

Juanjo =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=C1lvarez?= <juanjuxNO SPAMyahoo.es> writes:

k2 wrote:

 DMD 0.97: crash with struct sorting
 
 This code causes DMD 0.97 to segfault:
 
 struct Foo {
 
 int opCmp(Foo f)
 {
 return 0;
 }
 }
 
 int main(char[][] args)
 {
 Foo[] foo;
 
 foo.sort;
 
 return 0;
 }


Seems to work on Linux.

Nick <Nick_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <cers5l$m3a$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Juanjo =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=C1lvarez?=
says...
Seems to work on Linux.


I get a segfault on Linux, haven't tried Windows (but it should be the same.)
Since k2 used the word "segfault" I assume that was on Linux as well.

Nick