digitalmars.D.announce - TDPL Amazon rank at 4-months high
- Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> Feb 28 2011
- Bekenn <leaveme alone.com> Feb 28 2011
- Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> Feb 28 2011
- Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> Feb 28 2011
- Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> Mar 01 2011
- Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> Mar 01 2011
- Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> Mar 01 2011
- Daniel Gibson <metalcaedes gmail.com> Mar 01 2011
- Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> Mar 01 2011
- "Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> Mar 01 2011
- Jordi Sayol <g.sayol yahoo.es> Mar 01 2011
- Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> Feb 28 2011
- Russel Winder <russel russel.org.uk> Mar 01 2011
- "Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> Mar 01 2011
- Tomek =?ISO-8859-2?B?U293afFza2k=?= <just ask.me> Mar 06 2011
Hello, I've been witnessing a recent increase in interest in TDPL, which can be assumed to be a good proxy for interest in the language itself. The trend has been bucking for about 45 days now and is reflected in higher click-through rate on related ads and in a better Amazon sales rank. Today TDPL's Amazon rank has reached 24,896 (currently at 29,285; updated hourly), which is a 4-months high. (By high I actually mean small because lower rank is better.) Last time a better rank was reached was on October 29, 2010 (18,755). Amazon dynamically assigns unique sale ranks to all of its books such that 1 is the best seller and 8M is the least sold. Rank below 1,000 indicates a bestseller, below 10,000 means an excellent seller, and below 100,000 means a good seller. (Amazon's ranking system handles these tiers differently.) The sales rank of "good sellers" may fluctuate a lot so it needs smoothing by a moving average (for example TDPL's rank only on Feb 2 was 347,125). For a rough comparison, here's the current sales rank for two comparable books: Erlang - 129,001, Head First Java - 977. The latter book is the best selling comparable book. Andrei
Feb 28 2011
Awesome! I actually just received my copy (ordered through an Amazon reseller) a couple of days ago. I somehow ended up with one of the limited edition copies...
Feb 28 2011
On 2011-03-01 00:12, Bekenn wrote:Awesome! I actually just received my copy (ordered through an Amazon reseller) a couple of days ago. I somehow ended up with one of the limited edition copies...
The non-limited seems to be the rare one. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Feb 28 2011
On 3/1/11 1:11 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:On 2011-03-01 00:12, Bekenn wrote:Awesome! I actually just received my copy (ordered through an Amazon reseller) a couple of days ago. I somehow ended up with one of the limited edition copies...
The non-limited seems to be the rare one.
Yah, perhaps sales aren't that strong after all :o). Andrei
Feb 28 2011
On 3/1/11 7:28 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:47:52 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> wrote:Yah, perhaps sales aren't that strong after all :o).
You mean that, as the author, you don't even get to know how many copies sold? o_O
Addison Wesley Longman sends authors a tally every six months. Andrei
Mar 01 2011
On 3/1/11 2:04 AM, Russel Winder wrote:On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 01:47 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:On 3/1/11 1:11 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:On 2011-03-01 00:12, Bekenn wrote:Awesome! I actually just received my copy (ordered through an Amazon reseller) a couple of days ago. I somehow ended up with one of the limited edition copies...
The non-limited seems to be the rare one.
Yah, perhaps sales aren't that strong after all :o). Andrei
Perhaps they reprinted with "the fault" in order to milk the "limited edition" factor?
No.And remember the "best seller rank" is regionally dependent, i.e. different Amazon servers will deliver different results. There is also historical hysteresis to their figure: my "Developing Java Software" second edition still rates higher than the third edition even though the publisher reports the third edition has sold the same number of copies -- which is actually quite a lot thankfully.
Forgive my ignorance - I didn't know you have a book portfolio, and so impressive at that. Congratulations! Yah, there are many variables. Add to those many handling details that influence the process. TDPL has certainly sold more than 1830 copies by now (= the collector's edition count) but booksellers have no obligation to send older prints first, so it all depends on which batch they have handy when shipping. Also I'm sure some smaller booksellers have gotten a batch from the collector's edition that hasn't been sold yet. Andrei
Mar 01 2011
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:Yah, there are many variables. Add to those many handling details that influence the process. TDPL has certainly sold more than 1830 copies by now (= the collector's edition count) but booksellers have no obligation to send older prints first, so it all depends on which batch they have handy when shipping. Also I'm sure some smaller booksellers have gotten a batch from the collector's edition that hasn't been sold yet.
It could be like milk. You buy a new carton of milk, and shove it in the refrigerator. When you need some, you grab the carton in front, which is the new one. So the old milk remains "in stock" for months, years, ...
Mar 01 2011
Am 02.03.2011 01:26, schrieb Jordi Sayol:Al 01/03/11 21:57, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:Yah, there are many variables. Add to those many handling details that influence the process. TDPL has certainly sold more than 1830 copies by now (= the collector's edition count) but booksellers have no obligation to send older prints first, so it all depends on which batch they have handy when shipping. Also I'm sure some smaller booksellers have gotten a batch from the collector's edition that hasn't been sold yet.
It could be like milk. You buy a new carton of milk, and shove it in the refrigerator. When you need some, you grab the carton in front, which is the new one. So the old milk remains "in stock" for months, years, ...
milk + years = poison :-) To solve this, somebody invented FIFO (first in, first out), and FILO (first in, last out), to solve storage problems.
You'd need a fridge with two doors: one in the front, one in the back. Insert new food in the front, get food to eat from the back (or the other way round). But reinsert opened food in the back (or, in the alternative case, in the front). ;-)
Mar 01 2011
Daniel Gibson wrote:You'd need a fridge with two doors: one in the front, one in the back. Insert new food in the front, get food to eat from the back (or the other way round). But reinsert opened food in the back (or, in the alternative case, in the front).
Cleaning out what's in the back of the fridge is always a terrifying experience.
Mar 01 2011
"Daniel Gibson" <metalcaedes gmail.com> wrote in message news:ikk423$2e9r$5 digitalmars.com...Am 02.03.2011 01:26, schrieb Jordi Sayol:Al 01/03/11 21:57, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:Yah, there are many variables. Add to those many handling details that influence the process. TDPL has certainly sold more than 1830 copies by now (= the collector's edition count) but booksellers have no obligation to send older prints first, so it all depends on which batch they have handy when shipping. Also I'm sure some smaller booksellers have gotten a batch from the collector's edition that hasn't been sold yet.
It could be like milk. You buy a new carton of milk, and shove it in the refrigerator. When you need some, you grab the carton in front, which is the new one. So the old milk remains "in stock" for months, years, ...
milk + years = poison :-)
milk + years = cheese :)To solve this, somebody invented FIFO (first in, first out), and FILO (first in, last out), to solve storage problems.
You'd need a fridge with two doors: one in the front, one in the back. Insert new food in the front, get food to eat from the back (or the other way round). But reinsert opened food in the back (or, in the alternative case, in the front). ;-)
I think grocery stores sometimes have fridge cases that. Alton Brown has a fridge on the Good Eats set that his crew hacked up that way for "fridge POV" shots and for "The Lady of The Refrigerator".
Mar 01 2011
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Al 01/03/11 21:57, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:Yah, there are many variables. Add to those many handling details that=
now (=3D the collector's edition count) but booksellers have no obligatio= n to send older prints first, so it all depends on which batch they have = handy when shipping. Also I'm sure some smaller booksellers have gotten a= batch from the collector's edition that hasn't been sold yet.=20 It could be like milk. You buy a new carton of milk, and shove it in th=
s the new one.=20 So the old milk remains "in stock" for months, years, ... =20
milk + years =3D poison :-) To solve this, somebody invented FIFO (first in, first out), and FILO (fi= rst in, last out), to solve storage problems.=20 --=20 Jordi Sayol
Mar 01 2011
On Monday 28 February 2011 23:11:30 Jacob Carlborg wrote:On 2011-03-01 00:12, Bekenn wrote:Awesome! I actually just received my copy (ordered through an Amazon reseller) a couple of days ago. I somehow ended up with one of the limited edition copies...
The non-limited seems to be the rare one.
Well, at first. But there were only about 1000 non-limited ones, weren't there? They have to run out eventually. I've seen both limited and non-limited, so they're both out there, but the longer that the book has been out, the less likely it is to get one of the "limited edition" ones. I would have thought that it had been out long enough that that would be the case, but maybe not. Of course, it wouldn't be all that hard for there to be a number of limited editions in a particular warehouse that just hasn't shipped as many as elsewhere, and if you happen to get one shipped from there you get a limited edition whereas pretty much everywhere else has the normal ones now. Most of the people around here are likely to have the limited ones though (regardless of what is normal in general), simply because we generally picked up the book as soon is it came out. - Jonathan M Davis
Feb 28 2011
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 01:47 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:On 3/1/11 1:11 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:On 2011-03-01 00:12, Bekenn wrote:Awesome! I actually just received my copy (ordered through an Amazon reseller) a couple of days ago. I somehow ended up with one of the limited edition copies...
The non-limited seems to be the rare one.
Yah, perhaps sales aren't that strong after all :o). =20 Andrei
Perhaps they reprinted with "the fault" in order to milk the "limited edition" factor? And remember the "best seller rank" is regionally dependent, i.e. different Amazon servers will deliver different results. There is also historical hysteresis to their figure: my "Developing Java Software" second edition still rates higher than the third edition even though the publisher reports the third edition has sold the same number of copies -- which is actually quite a lot thankfully. =20 --=20 Russel. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n= et 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
Mar 01 2011
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:47:52 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> wrote:Yah, perhaps sales aren't that strong after all :o).
You mean that, as the author, you don't even get to know how many copies sold? o_O -- Best regards, Vladimir mailto:vladimir thecybershadow.net
Mar 01 2011
Daniel Gibson napisa=B3:You'd need a fridge with two doors: one in the front, one in the back. In=
new food in the front, get food to eat from the back (or the other way ro=
But reinsert opened food in the back (or, in the alternative case, in the=
Or a cylinder-shaped refrigerator with rotating food shelves. Put new stuff= in the front and turn the shelf slightly clockwise to expose oldest food f= or eating. Ain't circular buffers yummy? --=20 Tomek (the patent holder ;-)
Mar 06 2011









Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> 