• bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Mar 12 2008
• Christopher Wright <dhasenan gmail.com> Mar 12 2008
• BCS <ao pathlink.com> Mar 12 2008

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

I can see that lot of people are writing many things for D brick by brick :-)

Christopher Wright:
 Have you spent time searching for a failed test because your tests are 
 interleaved with your code?


I think having tests very close to their code is a good thing.

Bye,
bearophile

Christopher Wright <dhasenan gmail.com> writes:

bearophile wrote:
 I can see that lot of people are writing many things for D brick by brick :-)


I'm not entirely sure what you mean by that.

 Christopher Wright:
 Have you spent time searching for a failed test because your tests are 
 interleaved with your code?


 I think having tests very close to their code is a good thing.
 
 Bye,
 bearophile


But...if you don't use DUnit, it's very likely that I might cry.

On a more serious note, however you like to test, more power to you. 
xUnit's popular, though, and it's what I'm used to, so now I have it. 
And so does anyone else who wants it.

BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:

Reply to Christopher,

 bearophile wrote:
 
 I can see that lot of people are writing many things for D brick by
 brick :-)
 


 


Progress, Slow n' steady progress. One by one, the little things make a
language 
/really/ usable are getting done.